Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-03-1992
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1992
>
Agenda - 02-03-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 3:15:43 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 3:09:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/3/1992
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SLgvD4ARY <br />Support for a school bond referendum in Orange County is quite high. There is, however, a <br />strong negative correlation between support for the referendum and the amount of the bond. <br />Support for the lowest level, $45 million dollars, is 69.3 %, while only 37.2 % at an $85 <br />million level. At each level, support is highest among women, residents of the Chapel <br />Hill✓Carrboro School District and those who have not had children in either of the school <br />systems. (Those who have not had children may see more potential personal gain). <br />Awareness of the bond issues is rather low. While 51.1 % claim prior knowledge of the <br />proposed referendum, only 19.2% consider themselves "well informed" about enrollment <br />growth in the systems and only 12.5 % consider themselves "well informed" about the <br />proposed construction projects. Parents of children currently enrolled in one of the systems <br />are more likely to consider themselves "well informed." <br />Forty percent feel that the bond proceeds should be split between the two systems according <br />to projected enrollment. Twenty -three percent prefer that it be evenly divided between the <br />two districts. Forty percent of the Orange County district residents prefer an even <br />distribution. <br />Nearly two- thirds, 61.9 %, say the issue of school overcrowding is "extremely important" or <br />"very important" to their decision to support or not support the school bond referendum, <br />with no outstanding differences between demographic groups. <br />--- Based upon the analysis of the data collected for this study, Johnston, Zabor feels <br />comfortable suggesting that a bond referendum for $60 million could be successfully offered <br />in May of 1992. There are, however, a few caveats to this suggestion: <br />This research is a snapshot of opinion in mid- January 1992. As with any attempt <br />to predict results, the environment can change between survey and actual public. <br />offering. The further away from January the actual referendum occurs, the less <br />assurance one can have in this particular research. <br />" The success of a bond referendum to the schools my be impacted considerably by <br />a public relations campaign. <br />i <br />The local and national economies will likely change in the coming months. The <br />impact on voter preference could be important. <br />The cohesiveness of opinion espoused by political leaders for Orange County, and the <br />two school boards could dramatically impact the results. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.