Orange County NC Website
BOB REEBER, Chapel Hill, spoke in support of the schools. He <br />stated that now is a good time to build a school because the interest <br />rates are low. This will also help the economy. If schools are not <br />built now, prisons will be built in 15 years. He asked that the Board <br />do it in May and do it for more than 66 million. He asked that every <br />school be brought up to specification. He supports 12 month schools. <br />GEORGE KINGMAN indicated he does not want to pay taxes but the cost <br />of education is one that needs to be confronted. Scrimping on education <br />will mean more funds on social programs. He pledges as a retired person <br />on a limited income that he will support the bond issue. <br />MIKE BROWN, Orange County Schools, feels the figures are what they <br />should be but asked if people can afford a bond referendum. He wants <br />the money spent wisely. There is disparity between the two systems. <br />They both have honest -to- goodness needs. The County does not have the <br />programs that are offered in Chapel Hill. The needs are there. He <br />wants both to get what they need. He doesn't know if May is the right <br />time. There are a lot of businesses cutting back. He would support 66 <br />million. He asked if these figures are where they need to be. He <br />recognizes the need for facilities for the students but stated that the <br />real process takes place in the classroom between the student and the <br />teacher. <br />MARY BOBBITT- COOKE, member of the Orange County School Board, <br />stated that the dollar numbers are not based on numbers that are <br />realistic but exaggerated. There are counties that are building <br />excellent schools for much less money. The committee did not deal with <br />other creative ways than brick and mortar. Year round schools were not <br />considered as a more creative way. She questions if people can afford <br />this bond issue. The university is downsizing because of the state's <br />shortfall and there are layoffs in the Triangle Park area. She asked <br />if the 1990's will mirror the 1980's as far as growth. She feels the <br />county taxpayers will ask these questions. She is concerned that the <br />Board of County Commissioners took out the technology package. The <br />districts recognize each others need. She will support a bond package <br />that will include technology and real figures for all students. <br />BILL DORSETT stated that he opposes this bond as proposed. He would <br />support doing this through sales taxes. <br />MAX KENNEDY stated that the bond package is in deep trouble in both <br />ends of the County. There are people out there who will not support <br />this bond package because there are a lot of people who are not <br />insulated against economic insecurity. He believes that any bond is <br />going to be in serious trouble. The people will be voting against <br />higher taxes and not against education. The referendum will stand a <br />better chance in May than November. The growth in northern Orange <br />County will not catch up with Chapel Hill because of the inadequate <br />supply of water. <br />With no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Chair <br />Carey adjourned the meeting at 11:03 p.m. The next regular meeting will <br />