Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
69 <br />COLEMAN, BERNHOLZ, <br />BERNHOLZ, GLEDHTLL, HARGRAVE & HERMAN <br />ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />THE LAw BUILDING <br />129 EAST TRYON STREET <br />POST OFFICE DRAWER 1529 <br />HILLSBOROUGH, NC. 27278 <br />TEL: 919 -732 -2196 <br />919 - 942 -8000 <br />FAX: 919- 732 -7997 <br />SUITE 300, THE CENTER <br />1506 EAST FRANKLIN STREET <br />CHAPEL HILL, NC 27514 <br />TEL 919- 929.7151 <br />FAX: 919 -929 -3892 <br />n�, ;, r-. <br />i �; c. <br />�.a <br />August 9, 1991 <br />ALONZO B. COLEMAN, JR. <br />STEVEN A. BERNHOLZ <br />ROGER B. BERNHOLZ <br />GEOFFREY E. GLEDHILL <br />DOUGLAS HARGRAVE <br />G. NICHOLAS HERMAN Ms. Jane A. Garrett <br />KIM K. STEFFAN <br />JANET B. DUTTON Planner <br />JOHN D. LOFTIN Orange County Planning Department <br />Of Counsel 306F Revere Road <br />BONNER D. SAWYER <br />(1902-1972) Hillsborou g h, North Carolina 27278 <br />RE: Featherwood, Phase I <br />Dear Jane: <br />The enclosed copy of the road maintenance <br />agreement for Featherwood Court, the private road <br />located in Phase I of Featherwood, satisfies the Orange <br />County Subdivision Regulations. <br />With a copy of this letter to Marvin Collins, I am <br />confirming our conversation on July 18, 1991 regarding <br />his July 15, 1991 memorandum to me. The concern <br />expressed in my July 3, 1991 letter about the so- called <br />"residual" parcel being excluded from consideration as <br />part of this subdivision was not a private road <br />concern. Rather, it was that the division of the 15+ <br />acre parcel is just that. Five lots are being created, <br />one of which is greater than ten acres. Since the <br />subdivision was approved wit a priyate road, the <br />prohibition against further subdivision contained n <br />Section IV- B -3 -d -1 (the next to last paragraph which <br />reads: "Restrictive covenants which prevent further <br />subdivision of the property shall be made a condition <br />of approval of a private road. ") e� rtain. And, as <br />indicated in my July 3, 1991 letter, other lot <br />standards also pertain to the so- called residua <br />arcel. <br />I recognize that this minor subdivision has been <br />approved in the form presented to me with Jane <br />Garrett's May 31, 1991 letter. For that reason, I do <br />not think this subdivision should be reconsidered with <br />the above analysis in mind. I do think we should <br />develop a plan for establishing standards applicable <br />