Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 11-19-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 12:06:35 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 12:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11-'12.81 12:26 $fllaa�. <br />003 <br />Ili <br />standards in Falls Lake are consistent with the standards for a WS -III. A WS-III <br />classification would mean about 10% more land area would be defined as critical area in <br />Falls Lake. <br />6. Jordan Lake: The Jordan Lake water supply watershed in Wake County is <br />appropriate for WS-IV classification as proposed. <br />Comment*. E=ept for the size of the protected area, Wake County's standards in <br />Jordan Lake meet or exceed the standards for a WS-IV. Due to the topography in the <br />Jordan Lake watershed, the 1 mile standard for critical area would result in a smaller <br />critical area than under Wake's existing standards. The size of stream buffers and the <br />Protected area would have to be expanded. Barring unforeseen complications, no major <br />impacts are anticipated in the Wake County portion of Research Triangle Park <br />designated as protected area. If necessary, Wake County could request an exemption or <br />variance from the EMC regarding certain aspects of the water supply rules for Research <br />Triangle Park, <br />7. Buffalo Creek: The Buffalo Creek tributary in the Little River watershed is not <br />appropriate for WS-IV protected area classification as proposed; adhere to the 5 and 10 <br />mile standards for lakes and river intakes. <br />Comment The land in the Buffalo Creek subbasin is beyond the five mile definition of <br />Protected area. If the five mile standard for protected area is to be exceeded, there <br />should be some good and valid reasons. The Buffalo Creek subbasin (17,660 acres) <br />includes a portion of Rolesville's perimunicipal planning area, rural planning area, the <br />Robertson's Pond special watershed planning area, the U.S. 64 East special highway <br />planning area, all of Wendell's perimuaic4W planning area, and a portion of Zebulon's <br />perimunicipal planning area. The proposal to classify Buffalo Creek as WS-IV protected <br />area is unnecessarily restrictive, inconsistent with the standard for protected area, and <br />inconsistent with Wake County's adopted General Development Plan which designates <br />portions of this area for future urban land uses. <br />8. Moccasin Creek: The Moccasin Creek tributary in the Contentnea Creek <br />watershed is not appropriate for WS-IV protected area classification as proposed; adhere <br />to the 5 and 10 mile standards for lakes and-river intakes. <br />Comment: The land in the Moccasin Creek subbasin is beyond the five mile definition <br />of protected area_ If the five mile standard for protected area is to be exceeded, there <br />should be some good and valid reasons. The Moccasin Creek subbasin (10,700 acres) <br />includes rural planning area, U.S. 64 East and U.S- 264 special highway planning areas, <br />and the remainder of Zebulon's perimunicipal planning area. The proposal to classify <br />Moccasin Creek as WS-IV protected area is unnecessarily restrictive, inconsistent with <br />the standard for protected area, and inconsistent with Wake County's adopted General <br />Development Plan which designates portions of this area for future urban land--uses. <br />9. Wake Finislft Plant: The portion of the Neuse River from the Falls Lake darn <br />to the Wake Finishing Plant water intake is not appropriate for WS-IV classification as <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.