Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-19-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 11-19-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 12:06:35 PM
Creation date
11/8/2017 12:01:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/19/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
must also be coordinated. They also need access to other data bases. <br />The technology is available. The equipment is available to handle the <br />entire County. Roscoe Reeve illustrated by using overhead projections <br />how the CAD system integration will operate. The system will take in <br />information and then allow the appropriate dispatch to take place. <br />John Link stated that the challenge is to merge these two systems which <br />will require integration by outside consultants. No one has integrated <br />these four functions into one. A proposal will be presented to the <br />Board of County Commissioners on Dec. 2 which will include the cost to <br />integrate these two systems. The funds have been 'included in the <br />budget. Commissioner Insko asked for a report on the system and asked <br />for background information which Rod visser will present at the next <br />meeting. Commissioner Insko asked what the classification "roadway <br />characteristics" would include and Roscoe Reeve said this includes roads <br />under construction, dead end roads, one way streets, and etc. John Link <br />recommended a work session to further illustrate the need for outside <br />support for this integration. It was the consensus December the B a oard in to set <br />the <br />a special meeting for 6:30 p.m. on Monday, <br />Commissioners' Library in the Court Street Annex, Hillsborough, for the <br />purpose of viewing a likely demonstration <br />be recommended afor purchase by the County. AD <br />software that would <br />C. BOND EDUCATION COMMITTEE PROCESS <br />The Board received a report on the bond education process bond referendum that was <br />that took in <br />e County voters in November, 1988. approved by y Oran 988. The report outlined <br />Orange <br />the major elements of this process. <br />John Link asked that the Board take leadership in developing a <br />strategy for promoting a bond referendum. Chair Carey suggested <br />appointing a group of interested people to begin work on a bond issue. <br />Some members of the CIP committee have indicated an interest in serving <br />on an educational /promotional committee. He would like to have this <br />committee appointed in December. The Board of County Commissioners must <br />still decide on a bond package that will be taken to public hearing. <br />John Link will bring to the Board of County Commissioners the absolute <br />deadlines for the bond process. The Board directed the Clerk to <br />advertise for members of this bond promotion committee. The Board will <br />also recruit volunteers for this committee. <br />D. WATERSHED COMMENTS FROM ADJOINING JURISDICTIONS <br />The Board received an update on EMC watershed public hearing <br />comments and requests from adjoining jurisdictions in the Upper Neuse <br />River basin. Planner David Stancil summarized this report. He <br />distributed an additional chart which showed the other seven <br />jurisdictions and their watershed designations. On a map he showed the <br />final recommendation of the other jurisdictions involved in the eleven <br />watersheds. He referred to the LUP and a map showing the state's <br />watershed classifications. Commissioner Gordon asked about the original <br />recommendation for Jordan Lake. Stancil indicated that the County <br />recommended WS2, but because it was recognized that this is a regional <br />lake and the State would classified it as WS4, the County accepted this <br />classification. Chatham County requested WS3. The Chair indicated he <br />would entertain a motion that would modify the recommendation sent to <br />the State. various questions were asked by Commissioner Gordon that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.