Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />_2 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />45 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />- _ r-. ti'ti . . u L= <br />37 <br />Article 8.2.2. Mr. Davis feels that the granting of this SUP will <br />enhance the salability of the property. <br />Vic Knight, local appraiser, stated that he was hired to <br />evaluate the impact that this particular use would have on the subject <br />property. With regard to the value aspect as it pertains to the <br />adjoining and contiguous properties, he looked at the sales of <br />surrounding properties of two other bed and breakfast establishments and <br />how they may have been impacted by the granting of a SUP. What he <br />determine was that the value impact seems to be negligible or nil. M:-. <br />Davis' property was not used as a comparable because his property did <br />not change ownership. The use of the property as a bed and breakfast <br />would cause a significantly less impact than other uses might on this <br />property in that particular location. <br />Mr. Davis stated he doesn't want something in his neighborhood <br />that is not needed. <br />Chair Carey stated that it would be Mr. Davis' responsibilit_- <br />to present evidence that the value of his property would decrease i-O <br />this proposal is approved. After this public hearing, the Planning <br />Board may receive and take into consideration any written evidence, <br />including that which would be contrary to what has been presented. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />Commissioner Gordon that the application be referred to the Planning <br />Board for a recommendation to be returned to the Board of Commissioners <br />no sooner than November 4, 1991 and no later than December 4, 1991. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />9JLL8BORQUG-E- -WUE8-T TO 21,BA 8IXTrig 4 INCX WATER LIN9 <br />This report is in response to Hillsborough's request to OWASA <br />to purchase the OWASA sixteen inch water line which has been used to <br />transport water between Hillsborough and OWASA. In answer to a question <br />from Commissioner Gordon, Paul Thames stated that OWASA questioned that <br />if Hillsborough got control of the line and they developed in the area <br />served by the line to such an extent that the demand for water used up <br />a large portion of the carrying capacity of that line and OWASA needed <br />to get water in or out of Hillsborough through that line, how would that <br />be accomplished. Thames stated that in any event Hillsborough would <br />have to have a new pump station built at the boundary of the service <br />area because OwASA,s existing <br />high pressure zone. This pu: <br />overcome the high pressure zor <br />to satisfy the Hillsborough s <br />carry the water from OWASA tc <br />station can be designed to OTA <br />building a pump station would <br />this line comes into Guest <br />financially to build a 12" li; <br />Chair Carey emphasi <br />area of consistency use of the <br />any LUP that the Board agrees <br />the continued availability c <br />pumps wouia not De aerie to pump into a <br />zp station would need to be designed to <br />e and be able to run enough water through <br />arvice area water demand plus be able to <br />Hillsborough. He feels that this punp <br />kSA's satisfaction. The problem is that <br />be costly and the feasibility of buying <br />.on. Hillsborough may be better off <br />ie instead of buying this 16" line. <br />red that the Board's interest lie in the <br />line with the County's Land Use Plan and <br />on with the Town of Hillsborough and in <br />E that line for transmission purposes. <br />