Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-22-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-22-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:58:51 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/22/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. DEFINITION OF NEW DEVELOPMENT <br />10. <br />subdivide"F window <br />_-or developers wi <br />of 12 -18 months. <br />CRITICAL WATERSHED (CW) DESIGNATION <br />permitting <br /><e_3��:�t: >:::::::La�� >�:;'tar ��'�: *:: The University <br />d X4.1 :: :. •. ., VI,; :':'••. ::;`:•,.`:i'i!'J:J: :... -- :. ::::. >:.:::. } }•<:::'.r:.: ••. :ri•:Sth:: :<.:: {n } }•:.:i•}: <br />fake wla'erslied study "bf 198` "demonstrated special conditions <br />that warranted protection measures adopted by Orange County <br />and Carrboro in that year that provide for no further <br />degradation of the water quality in this watershed. The <br />current protection measures go above and beyond the state <br />minimum standards for WS -2, and Critical Watershed designation <br />would provide recognition of that fact. <br />11. UPPER ENO BASIN CLASSIFICATION <br />As previously stated, the preliminary classification of the <br />Eno River basin treats all portions of the basin in the same <br />manner. There are significant differences, however, between <br />sub - basins in the Eno River.- These difference range from <br />density of existing development to location of existing and <br />future water supplies. There are three existing water bodies <br />(two serving as supplies) and three proposed water supplies in <br />the Upper and Middle Eno basins. There are no water supplies <br />existing or proposed in the Lower Eno basin, with the <br />exception of the City of Durham's emergency water intake on <br />the Eno. The future disposition of this emergency water source <br />is currently being discussed by Durham County and Durham City. <br />Historically and to this day, Orange County has separated this <br />basin into the "Upper Eno ", located north and west of Lake Ben <br />Johnson in Hillsborough; and the "Lower Eno ", from Lake Ben <br />Johnson to the Durham County line. As such, watershed <br />protection measures similar to that of the proposed WS -III <br />classification have been applied to the zoned portions of the <br />Upper Eno basin since 1984. Recent policy discussion on the <br />implications of Interstate 85/40 and the Efland community have <br />led the County to add a third sub -basin to reflect the <br />different character of the "Middle Eno", from Corporation Lake <br />to Lake Ben Johnson. <br />In its preliminary watershed classifications, NCDEM has <br />recommended a classification of WS -IV for the entire basin. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.