Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-22-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-22-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:58:51 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:53:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/22/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
264
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION: <br />1 +1814:6 <br />�03 <br />Waddell stated that he felt the funds should be <br />retained for land acquisition. <br />Burklin expressed concern that no equipment had <br />been purchased for parks already in existence. <br />He felt that development, as well as the purchase <br />of equipment should be options for the use of the <br />funds. <br />Cantrell noted that the funds -to -date were <br />probably not sufficient to purchase land so she <br />felt the development of parks was a need for <br />which the funds should be used. <br />Waddell expressed the concern that if the funds <br />were to be used for park development, future <br />funding by the Commissioners would not be <br />available. <br />Eidenier indicated she was of the opinion that <br />the funds should be retained for land <br />acquisition. <br />Cantrell asked about the total collected thus far <br />in the Payment -In -Lieu account. Cameron <br />responded approximately $40,000.00. She <br />continued that the funds are divided by service <br />districts. Cantrell continued, asking if a <br />breakdown of the.funds by district could be <br />provided. Cameron indicated she could provide <br />such information at the next meeting. <br />The motion to approve was withdrawn by the first <br />and the second. <br />Reid moved to table this item until a breakdown <br />Of funds by districts can be provided. Seconded <br />by Hoecke. <br />(Ramsey left the meeting prior to this vote.) <br />7 in favor. <br />1 opposed (Waddell - wanted the funds retained <br />for land acquisition). <br />(2) Vesting of Property Rights <br />a. Section II -- Definitions <br />(Minor Subdivision, Site Specific <br />Development Plan, Vested Right) <br />b. Section III -D -2- <br />Preliminary Plat Approval <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.