Browse
Search
1991-10-10_BOCC_PUBLIC HR_00001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
1991-10-10_BOCC_PUBLIC HR_00001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:55:13 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:51:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/10/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
mining and quarry operations. Currently Bingham Township, Tax Map 28,10t 9B is <br />the only property so designated for this type of use. The amendment application <br />requests that the extractive use category be extended to the remaining <br />properties. Amendments to the JPA Land use Plan require the unanimous approval <br />of the governing boards of Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Orange County as specified <br />in the Joint Planning Agreement. <br />CP -3 -91 requests the establishment of a Rural industrial Activity <br />Node covering the subject properties. A Rural Industrial Activity Node is land <br />focused on designated road intersections in the rural areas that is appropriate <br />for small scale industrial uses which do not require urban -type services. Such <br />an amendment requires only the approval of the Orange County Commissioners. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE PLANNING STAFF <br />AND /OR THE ELECTED OFFICIALS <br />Town of Chapel Hill Planning Director Roger Walden emphasized that this <br />is an existing use in this watershed area. The key short -term issue in the <br />opinion of he and his staff is water quality. Discussions with OWASA staff and <br />review of reports relevant to the subject indicate a greater concern on OWASA's <br />part toward the possibility of runoff and /or a spill from the existing asphalt <br />plant rather than runoff from quarrying operations. These concerns would be <br />largely addressed by the proposed relocation of the asphalt plant. Associated <br />improvements with the plant relocation would include above- ground storage tanks <br />with containment facilities, a modern plant which would operate at lower <br />temperature, and an improved system of emissions control for air pollutants. <br />The key long -term issue has to do with hydrology. Phil's Creek is shown on the <br />1983 FEMA floodplain map as having a 100 year floodway approximately 2100 feet <br />in width, crossing the site as described under the "slope" section. This water <br />course has been significantly altered by the existing quarry operations. It is <br />not clear whether the quarry operation could function outside of the floodplain. <br />Environmental review procedures would apply to an expanded quarry. Also, a full <br />environmental impact statement would be required at the time a special use permit <br />was considered. The applicant would address impacts on the floodplain at that <br />point. With regard to the quarry operation, it is Chapel Hill staff's opinion <br />that surface runoff will go into the pit. With regard to the relocation of the <br />asphalt plant, there is currently an asphalt plant in operation and from review <br />of the materials it appears that safety at the plant would be improved by the <br />proposed changes. Chapel Hill planning staff recommends approval of this <br />request. <br />No comments were made by the Carrboro staff. <br />In response to a question regarding why this area needs to be designated <br />as a Rural - Industrial Activity Node and the implications of this designation, <br />Mr. Collins indicated that Agricultural /Industrial would be spot zoning. This <br />activity node is site - specific. The boundary of the activity node follows the <br />boundary of the proposed quarry operation. There would be no other uses <br />associated with it other than the extractive use. <br />Commissioner Gordon requested that more data be gathered as to the effect <br />of the quarry operation on Phils Creek. Also, she indicated that it would be <br />helpful to have information on how an improperly operating asphalt plant could <br />adversely effect the watershed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.