Browse
Search
1991-10-10_BOCC_PUBLIC HR_00001
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
1991-10-10_BOCC_PUBLIC HR_00001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:55:13 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:51:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/10/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
042 <br />Justification for a negative recommendation. However, from the <br />standpoint of the requested amendment, HYDROLOGY is arguably the <br />single most important locational criterion. It is precisely for <br />reasons such as this that there are other policy considerations <br />that come into play in acting on such amendments under the JPA and <br />Land Use Element. These considerations take into account the public <br />interest; the health, safety and general welfare of Orange County <br />citizens. In evaluating these amendments against the criteria, the <br />"benefits" of guaranteed future water storage capacity - including <br />safeguards contained in the four -party agreement - seem to outweigh <br />the reservations associated with expanding the use within the <br />watershed. <br />As such, the joint staffs of Chapel Hill, orange County and <br />Carrboro concur with the "changed or changing conditions" cited by <br />applicants and recommend approval of JPA -1 -91. Likewise, Orange <br />County staff concurs with the "changes or changing conditions" <br />cited by applicants and recommends approval of CP -3 -91, with the <br />knowledge that safety measures through the state and the County's <br />Environmental Impact Ordinance will safeguard and greatly increase <br />the likelihood that this proposal will result in a gain for all <br />county and town residents. <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.