Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-07-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:52:30 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />`1 North Carolina Association of County Commissioners <br />ZONING VESTED RIGHTS <br />G.S. 153 -344.1 <br />(SENATE SILL 766) <br />At the urging of the North Carolina Home Builders Association, <br />(hereinafter "HBA ") during the 1989 session of the North Carolina <br />General Assembly, the Senate passed a version of Senate Bill 766 <br />that would have allowed a property owner to acquire a vested right <br />upon filing a "notice of,' intent to develop. " The vested right <br />would have frozen the allowable uses, density and dimensional <br />requirements applicable to the property for a period of two years. <br />This version of the bill was unacceptable to North Carolina <br />counties. However, the North Carolina Association of County <br />Commissioners (hereinafter "Association ") and the North Carolina <br />League of Municipalities (hereinafter "League ") did indicate a <br />willingness to discuss a more rational approach to establishing <br />certain vested rights before the issuance of a building permit. <br />Specifically, the Association and League offered as a model a <br />Colorado law that moves up the point at which development rights <br />vest to the time when a "site specific development plan" or a <br />"development agreement" is approved by a local governing body. <br />In the 1990 short session, the House subcommittee considering <br />Senate Bill 766 urged the Association and the HBA to negotiate a <br />compromise. Using the Colorado law as a starting point, the <br />Association, the League and the HBA hammered out a compromise that <br />was ultimately ratified by the General Assembly as Chapter 996 of <br />the 1989 Session Laws (1990 Regular Session) (hereinafter referred <br />to as "the Act"). The Act,- most of which is codified as G.S. <br />153A- 344.1 (for counties) and G.S. 160A -385.1 (for cities), has an <br />effective date of October 1, 1991. <br />Through a series of questions and answers, this document <br />provides a,basic analysis of the new law. The appendix includes a <br />copy of the portions of the G.S. 153A -344.1 that are applicable to <br />counties and an annotated model ordinance that may be adapted for <br />use by individual local governments. In reviewing these materials, <br />please note that. they, are intended only as a resource for local <br />officials and not as the final word on a complicated law. Also, <br />since this new law is, with limited exceptions, self- implementing, <br />local officials' need to become and remain familiar with it in <br />addition to any locally adopted ordinance. Since the issues raised <br />by G.S.. -153A -344.1 involve important legal and planning concerns, <br />the. county attorney and planning professionals should be consulted <br />early and fully. <br />-OVER- <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.