Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DpGlfi', <br />14 <br />architectural surveys. It may take some time for her to adjust <br />herself to the architectural styles and settings of a rural North <br />Carolina county such as Orange County. She has also worked in <br />suburban settings, most recently with the Town of Chapel Hill. <br />She has also done some survey work related to highway projects <br />which included historical sites. <br />Collins stated that the order of preference of the consultants is <br />as follows: (1) Lally - Little, (2) Pezzoni, (3) Jacobs - Little, and <br />(4) Reeb. <br />Peloquin asked if there would be a problem for Dan Pezzoni to <br />conduct the survey since he lives in another state. <br />Dickinson stated that it would be easier for someone closer by to <br />conduct the survey, but if Pezzoni were chosen, he could come and <br />stay overnight as much as needed. She also stated that she <br />agreed with Collins' recommendation and how he ranked them. <br />Anderson stated that the Lally - Little team was very familiar with <br />source materials and documents from this area. She stated that <br />the process is quite complicated if you are unfamiliar with such <br />.documents. <br />Collins stated that if a recommendation is prepared for the <br />Commissioners, it would go to their meeting on October 7th. If <br />the Commissioners approve the recommended consultant, the next <br />step in the process would be a Phase I contract. This would be <br />where the consultants would do a reconnaissance survey of the <br />township. From the survey the consultant will develop a specific <br />project description and projected time payment schedule. Next <br />would be the Phase II or detailed contract. <br />Collins mentioned that of the four consultants, the Lally - Little <br />team were the only ones that said they would allow time for <br />public presentation of the survey work. <br />MOTION: Jeff Peloquin moved to use the Lally - Little team for <br />the consultant. Seconded by Trawick ward. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />AGENDA ITEM #b: DISCUSSION ITEMS <br />Bylaws and Rules of Procedure <br />Cameron stated that the Bylaws and Rules of Procedure were not <br />ready to be discussed at this time. <br />AGENDA ITEM #7: INFORMATIONAL ITEMS <br />Dickinson thanked Emily for including sections of the Enabling <br />Legislation which will be very helpful to the Commission. <br />A <br />