Agenda - 10-07-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DaGI� a 13 ended up with the Pezzoni and Lally- Little proposals. Collins stated that he had met with Barry Jacobs, Kelly Lally and Ruth Little, and Dan Pezzoni, but not Mary Reeb. He stated that he ranked the Lally- Little proposal as being the highest in terms of their qualifications and type of work they have done in this general region. The team will be ready to start next month if chosen, with a completion projection date of July, 1992. Field work would be done one to two days per week from October through February when the leaves have fallen from the trees and the structures can be seen better. The team submitted no budget proposal. They simply indicated that the budget salary would be divided equally between them. He stated that the consultants are interested because they are looking at the second phase, the rest of the County. They are willing to work within the constraints of the budget now with hopes of being awarded a bigger project in the future. Collins stated that Dan Pezzoni was also highly recommended by the State Historic Preservation Office. Pezzoni completed the county -wide inventory for Onslow County which included about 780 sites. Pezzoni has done a number of National Register nominations based on his survey work. He stated that Pezzoni has a keen interest in historic architecture and historic landscape elements. The consultant indicated that the project could be commenced in September, 1991, and would take 3 to 3 -1/2 months to complete. No budget proposal was submitted by the consultant. The consultant indicated that the inventory could be completed within the budget submitted as part of grant application. Collins stated that in terms of the Jacobs- Little proposal, Jacobs' knowledge of the County is extensive. Jacobs has never undertaken a historic survey of this scale, but he has done a number of National Register nominations. He stated that Jacobs is quite a good writer and researcher. He also stated that Jacobs and Little would be working as a team, and Little would be basically training Jacobs on how to do historic survey work. Their estimated time for completion of field work was two months. An additional two months would be required for research and final documentation.____They also agreed to work within the confines of the budget. He stated that Jacobs requested additional support which would include the use of a County automobile, copies of various maps, intern assistance in coordination of appointments and cataloging of materials, film and photo processing, and reimbursement for phone calls and work related mileage. All of these items were covered by the proposed project budget with the exception of the use of an automobile. Insurance restrictions would eliminate the use of a County automobile unless driven by a Planning Intern who is an employee of the County. Collins stated that the final proposal was sent by Mary Reeb. The consultant estimated the time for completion to be 175 hours (1 -1/2 months). She also submitted a proposed budget which is generally in line with preliminary budget submitted as part of grant application. The difference.could be negotiated. He stated that Reeb has done work in Ohio counties in terms of doing