Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-07-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:52:30 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4Cv <br />9/18/91 <br />RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />STATE WATER SUPPLY WATERSHED CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS <br />Recommended .Water SupR_ly Watershed Classifications <br />Back Creek Watershed: Recommend change to WS -3 <br />Cane Creek Watershed: Agree with WS -2 <br />Flat River: Agree with WS -2 <br />Haw Creek: Agree with WS -2 <br />Haw River: Agree with WS -4 <br />South Hyco Creek: <br />Recommend change to WS -3 <br />Jordan Lake: <br />Agree with WS -4. <br />Little River: <br />Agree with WS -2. <br />University Lake: <br />Agree with WS -2, also recommend <br />(Morgan Creek) <br />designation of CRITICAL WATERSHED (CW). <br />Eno River Basin: <br />Recommend separating the basin into <br />three sub - basins. The "Upper Eno ", <br />upstream of Corporation Lake (intake point <br />105.0) is recommended for WS -2 <br />classification with one current water <br />supply and two potential supplies. The <br />"Middle Eno ", between Lake Ben Johnson <br />(intake point 103.0) and Corporation Lake <br />(including the proposed Seven -Mile Creek <br />basin) is recommended for WS -3. <br />For the "Lower Eno" basin (from Lake Ben <br />Johnson through Hillsborough into Durham, <br />the Planning Board recommends that the Eno <br />emergency intake in Durham be protected as <br />follows. As a primary approach, the use of <br />vegetative stream buffers, as proposed by <br />by the Durham City- County Planning <br />Department is recommended. Failing this, <br />the Planning Board recommends that the <br />Lower Eno Protected Area continue to <br />be classified WS -4 - for the 10 -mile <br />protected area only. <br />Summary: upper Eno: WS -2 <br />Middle Eno: WS -3 <br />Lower Eno: Buffers, or WS -4 <br />The Planning Board also recommends that completion of special <br />watershed studies be used as the primary criterion for determining <br />whether other watersheds may qualify for CRITICAL WATERSHED (CW) STATUS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.