Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-07-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:52:30 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3°► <br />s The University Lake watershed <br />IN o 1 emonstraec special conditions that warranted <br />protection measures adopted by the Board of Commissioners in <br />that year. The current protection measures go above and beyond <br />the state minimums, and CW status would provide recognition of <br />that fact. <br />Staff also recognizes that impending study of the Cane Creek <br />watershed iqi 1992 may lend credence to a like designation for <br />this water supply. By the same token certain portions -of the <br />Upper Eno basin containing the proposed WS -II segment of the <br />watershed might also be appropriate for this designation, <br />although there is no data to quantify such status at this <br />time. The::::.ountr.,.,.. and:.v:.t:Kawn<: >: of :::a : lebruchn:mav::<::ws:: >:::r <br />P�OJ!14*15: r91 § :KTj4,IID@O=T*l44_ x4�;J <br />The preliminary classification of the Eno basin treats all <br />portions in Orange County the same, even though there are no <br />water sources east of Hillsborough in Orange County. <br />Historically and currently, orange County has separated this <br />basin into the "Upper Eno ", north and west of Lake Ben Johnson <br />in Hillsborough; and the "Lower Eno", from Lake Ben Johnson to <br />the Durham County line. As such, watershed protection measures <br />similar to that of the current WS -III classification have been <br />applied to the zoned portions of the Upper Eno basin since <br />1984. <br />NCDEM, however, has recommended a classification of WS -IV, the <br />lowest quality drinking water classification, for the entire <br />basin. <br />There are a number of complicating factors in the Upper Eno <br />and Lower Eno. In the Upper Eno, what water sources should be <br />protected long -term? How should the suburban <br />corridor/ commercial industrial node along US 70/1 -85 in Efland <br />factor into the classification? In the Lower Eno, is there in <br />fact a watershed "Protected Area" extending west from Durham? <br />Durham City /County staff is recommending the use of buffers <br />rather than WS -IV "protected Area" standards for this area. <br />Staff recommends the following approach to the Eno basin. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.