Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-07-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 10-07-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:52:30 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:39:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/7/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Triangle region occurred on August 15, 1991. <br />Although the hearings have been concluded, the EMC is <br />accepting written comment as part of the hearing process until <br />October .31, 1991. In addition, the EMC has indicated that it will <br />hold a second public hearing (currently unscheduled) for the <br />Triangle region prior to October .31. <br />The hearing process that closes on October 31 may offer the <br />only chance for local governments to request different <br />classifications and.-standards for watersheds than those proposed. <br />As such, A staff report was presented to the Board of Commissioners <br />on August 5 that: <br />1. Identified the classification of each watershed as <br />Proposed by the EMC; <br />2. Compared existing and proposed development standards <br />applicable in each watershed; <br />3. Identified issues of both regional and watershed - <br />specific importance; and <br />4. Listed possible alternative actions to those proposed <br />by the EMC and adjoining local governments. <br />The report was presented to the Planning Board at its July 15, <br />1991 meeting. Comments were provided by the Planning Board in the <br />form of a "Summary of Recommendations" (copy attached). <br />THERE WERE NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />OR PLANNING BOARD <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENTS <br />Nancy Mueller spoke on behalf of the League of Women voters. <br />She indicated that the Leagues believes that protection of the <br />source of the water supply is the most economical and effective way <br />to protect our water. They support the Critical Watershed <br />designation for University Lake as well as rules on wastewater <br />discharges and limits on development densities. They also support <br />the new rules proposed for agriculture in WS -1 watersheds and WS- <br />11 Critical Areas. A copy of her statement is in the permanent <br />agenda file in the Clerk's office. <br />Lois Herring spoke on behalf of Orange Water and Sewer <br />Authority. She indicated that OWASA supports standards which <br />promote the protection rather than degradation of our water. A <br />copy of this statement in its entirety is in the permanent agenda <br />file in the Clerk's office. <br />Ed Harrison, a resident of Chapel H i l l and a member of the <br />North Carolina Sierra Club, requested support for a strong <br />statewide water supply protection program. He asked specifically <br />that the Critical Area designation be strengthened and protected. <br />He also requested that Orange County take whatever action is <br />necessary to control agricultural pollution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.