Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-17-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 09-17-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:42:05 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/17/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The cost of this type of project does not necessarily decrease in <br />the same proportion as project area covered. We could expect that <br />the overall cost of producing a regional or multi- jurisdictional <br />plan would remain relatively constant whether there are five or two <br />municipalities. The type of product we are striving for would <br />generally be applicable to all jurisdictions in the region. <br />The first option would assume the existing funding committments <br />from Chapel Hill and Durham, and no funding committment from the <br />remaining jurisdictions. In this case, the scope of work would <br />need to be dramatically changed. However, this may raise the <br />question of whether the combined Chapel Hill- Durham share ($17,500) <br />would be enough funds to make the effort worth while. The existing <br />scope of work could probably not be fulfilled with the current <br />funding committments, and a reduced scope of work may be <br />affordable, but may not yeild a' satisfactory or comprehensive <br />product. <br />A second option would require increasing funding from both Chapel <br />Hill and Durham. This option may allow for only small changes in <br />the scope of work and still produce a comprehensive product. <br />A third option would be to not pursue the effort of developing a <br />regional bike plan at this time. Opportunities may prove to be <br />more favorable in the future. <br />i <br />8� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.