Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
9 <br /> Thomas E. Warren, Chief Warrant Officer, US -Army <br /> P. Troop, 4th Squadron <br /> 3 3rd Armored Calvary Regiment r <br /> I Fort Bliss, Texas <br /> October 1, 1990 - April 1991 <br /> 3 V. 629CIAL FRESENTATZONS - N014E <br /> VI. <br /> &L RROXOSER--MENDMENTS O WAT UN ER ROLICy, Z_0NjpG <br /> AND-SUDDIYISTON REGULtTjoa <br /> 7 Bill Waddell chaired this portion of the meeting since this <br /> 5 public hearing involved the Planning Board. <br /> 7 The purpose of this item was to receive citizen comment on the <br /> 3 proposed amendments to the Water and Sewer Policy, Zoning Ordinance, and <br /> Subdivision Regulations which would allow water and/or sewer agreements <br /> which predated the County's Water and Sewer Policy to be carried out in <br /> i the Rural Buffer and Water Quality Critical , Areas. More specific, in <br /> 2 ' early April, a landowner in the Protected Watershed portion of the <br /> 3 University Lake Watershed in the Rural Suffer inquired about developing <br /> I an X8-acre parcel. He presented an agreement which he and his wife had <br /> signed with OWASA in 1983 for the purpose of conveying a parcel of land <br /> 5 as a pump station location in exchange for 'five water and five sewer <br /> 7 taps. The landowners would now like to use :the taps and develop their <br /> 9 property. OWASA officials have stated that they have no knowledge of <br /> 9 other similar agreements for water and/or sewer service. The proposed <br /> a amendment would add language to the Water and Sewer Policy to allow pre- <br /> 1 existing written service agreements to be honored. The second part of <br /> 2 the amendment would make the Interim Development Standards in the Zoning <br /> 3 Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations consistent with the amendment to <br /> 4 the Water and Sewer Policy. The 'Planning Staff recommends approval of <br /> 5 the proposed amendments. There were no citizen comments. <br /> 6 Motion was made , by , Commissioner Gordon, seconded by <br /> 7 Commissioner Halkiotis to refer this item to the Planning Board for a <br /> 3 recommendation to be considered by the County Commissioners no sooner <br /> 9 than September 3, 1991 . <br /> 0 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 1 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 VII. REPORTS <br /> 4 <br /> 5 &L. LUTE_WATERSRED PROT&0T_XQN UQCEDURES AN2 IMP,L=ZONS FOR <br /> 6 12RAN 23 COVNTY <br /> 7 The County Commissioners received a report from Planner David <br /> 8 Stancil on the implications of istate watershed protection rules and <br /> 9 classifications on current County policies/procedures. The <br /> 0, Environmental Management CommisFion (EMC) has proposed preliminary <br /> 1 classifications - for each of Orange County's 11 water supply watersheds. <br /> 2. The report prepared by the Planning Staff (1) explains the mandate <br /> i <br /> _.y <br /> 'an. <br />