Orange County NC Website
M <br />local government after the reclassification has occurred. <br />• Clustering. In the adopted rules, cluster type development <br />is allowed in all areas of ws -II, WS --III and WS--IV water- <br />sheds, including the critical areas. Previously clustering <br />was not allowed in critical areas. Clustering, if utilized <br />by local governments for future development, must conform <br />with the density limits of the water supply protection <br />requirements or utilize appropriate stormwater controls. <br />• Land Application of Sludge. Requirements for land <br />application of sludge materials were relaxed in the adopted <br />rules to allow existing permitted sites in WS-II, WS -III and <br />WS -IV critical areas and to allow new sites outside the <br />critical areas of these watersheds. <br />• Sewer Line Extensions. The restriction on new sewer lines <br />was eliminated in the adopted rules so that sewer lines are <br />allowed throughout WS -II, WS -III and WS -IV watersheds. <br />• Buffers. The original proposal for required buffers called <br />for a sizing criteria based on an equation which took into <br />account average slope around the waters. As this <br />requirement created considerable confusion and appeared to <br />potentially affect large areas of land, the adopted rules <br />utilize a minimum 100 foot buffer requirement for all <br />perennial waters in a water supply watershed. <br />• Hazardous Materials. The adopted rules eliminated specific <br />restrictions on the use of hazardous materials in water <br />supply watersheds and require only that local governments <br />maintain inventories of all such materials used, stored or <br />produced and develop spill /failure containment plans. It was <br />felt that other programs adequately cover the major sources <br />of hazardous materials. The initial thrust of these rules <br />should be to require local government knowledge of the <br />hazardous materials in their watershed and contingency plans <br />to deal with accidents. . <br />During the previous hearing process (August 1990) numerous <br />comments were received concerning the impacts of agriculture, <br />silviculture and Department of Transportation (DOT) activities. <br />While no specific requirements for these three areas were included <br />in the adopted rules, the EMC did instruct the DEM staff to review <br />these activities and conduct meetings with representatives from <br />these groups to discuss possible protection measures. In response <br />to these reviews, modifications to the adopted rules have been <br />proposed to clarify current requirements and practices and to <br />provided alternatives for additional protection. <br />Agricultural activities currently must comply with the Food <br />Securities Act 1985 and the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and <br />Trade Act of 1990. These acts require control of soil loss from <br />highly erodible cropland. If the provisions of these Acts are not <br />9 <br />