Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-26-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:43:46 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Classifications for each river basin so that interested 5 1 <br />will be able to easily determine the appropriate critical area. <br />boundary limits along streams and rivers. The schedule of <br />Classifications are based on hydrographic data depicted on U.S. <br />Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 (7.5 minute) topographic maps. <br />It should be noted that local governments will be responsible for <br />delineating the outer boundary limits of their critical areas. <br />Since they may utilize land marks, roads, property boundaries or <br />other features in this delineation, there could be a slight <br />difference between the stream segment description and the <br />delineation on land. . <br />In the water supply protection rules local governments may <br />choose to extend their critical or protected area boundaries <br />beyond the state minimum limits. Proposed classifications and maps <br />have been developed based on the minimum requirements established <br />in the adopted rules. where local governments choose to modify or <br />extend these boundaries, DEM should be advised of the intended <br />changes so that the proposed boundaries can be reviewed and records <br />made consistent as appropriate. This is especially important where <br />local governments choose to extend their critical or protected area <br />boundaries. Local government should provide copies of the <br />appropriate USGS 7.5 minute quad maps to DEM indicating any <br />modifications of the boundaries. <br />In some cases local governments have indicated that waters <br />currently classified for water supply areas are no longer being <br />used and there are no plans for future water supply use of these <br />waters. Thus these waters are being proposed to'be reclassified to <br />a classification other than for water supply use. If there are <br />other areas where waters are no longer being used for water supply <br />Purposes and there are no plans for future use, comments should be <br />provided by the local governments who have land use authority <br />around these waters during the hearing process so that these areas <br />can be reclassified in a similar manner. It should be noted that <br />all reclassifications must be approved by the U.S. Environmental <br />Protection Agency (EPA). In other cases waters that are not <br />currently classified for water supply use but are part of a water <br />supply watershed or protected area are proposed to be reclassified <br />as water supply waters. <br />There are some instances where waters flowing into other states <br />from North - Carolina are currently classified as water supply <br />waters. These classifications were based on downstream uses or <br />standards in the other states involved. Retaining these areas as <br />water supply waters would require that local governments impose <br />land use controls and protection ordinances to protect these <br />waters. At this time it is proposed that these areas be <br />reclassified to a classification other that water supply. Local <br />governments in North Carolina would not be required to adopt water <br />supply protection ordinances for these waters. <br />In developing the proposed classifications, information on <br />existing wastewater discharges and existing land use-practices was <br />evaluated to determine the most appropriate proposed classification <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.