Orange County NC Website
C. Reaction to the Proposed Rules. <br />35 <br />On May 6, 1990, the City Council adopted a resolution strongly urging the EMC to reconsider <br />its final rules; to give opportunity for the affected public to become aware of those rules as <br />proposed; and to receive public comment on those rules prior to their implementation. As a <br />result of these concerns by the City and others, the EMC decided to delay the effective date of <br />the rules adopted in December, 1990 until after receiving public comment on the proposed <br />reclassification of all exiting surface waters used for water supply purposes. Attachment 2 is <br />information provided by the DEM to summarize the proposed rules and classifications and <br />answers some commonly asked questions. <br />D. Public Comment on Rules and Classifications. <br />The EMC has set eight public hearings around the State in August to receive public comments <br />on the rules adopted in December, the proposed reclassification and another set of recently <br />proposed amendments. The hearing closest to Durham will be in Raleigh on August 15, 1991 <br />at 7:00 pm. (See Attachment 3 for a list of other public hearing places and dates.) Written <br />comments will be accepted before, during and within 30 days after completion of the hearing <br />procedures. The last day for acceptance of written comments will be September 30, 1991. <br />After the public hearings, the EMC can adopt rules and /or classifications that are more or less <br />stringent than those proposed if the EMC determines that the provisions adopted are a logical <br />outgrowth of the proposed criteria and information received during the hearing process. For <br />this reason, it is important that the City and County comment on areas where there is a concern <br />that the rules and /or classifications remain the same or become more stringent, as well as those <br />areas that should be more flexible, Modifications to the final rules and /or classifications could <br />potentially affect persons who are not currently affected under the what is proposed. Therefore, <br />it is very important that all interested and potentially affected persons make their opinions <br />known to the EMC hearing officer concerning all provisions of the proposed rules and <br />classifications. . <br />III. Implications of the Proposed Rules and Classifications. <br />Presented with this report is a large display map (not incorporated here due to production difficulties <br />and its size) with overlays showing the implications of the proposed regulations and several alternate <br />scenarios. These are intended to graphically depict the land area in Durham County that would be <br />defined as Critical Area and Protected Area under the adopted rules and proposed classifications. <br />A.. Present City and County Watershed Protection. <br />The City and County of Durham both have been regulating land for watershed protection since <br />the mid- 1980's. Although they generally approach watershed protection in the same way, some <br />of the specific elements of the City and County requirements are different. <br />The City's regulations define an inner ring Critical Area and an outer ring Limited Industrial <br />Area (LIA). At present, the City has jurisdiction over a small sliver of land that would meet <br />its requirements for Critical Area. The City does, however, have two areas of LIA. According <br />to the ordinance, LIA is applied to the area within 1/2 mile from the public property acquired <br />7 <br />