Orange County NC Website
2] <br />bona fide farms... I, to the extent the regulations attempt to have <br />the counties use their zoning power to control agriculture and <br />silviculture they are in violation of this statutory restriction. <br />"GRANDFATHERING" AND COMMENCEMENT OF NEW ACTIVITIES <br />.0104(s) and (t) permit the "grandfathering" of existing <br />development on the date of the close of the public hearings. The <br />commencement of new activities following the closing date of the <br />public hearings must comply with the rules. These two provisions <br />violate the Law of the Land Clause of the North Carolina <br />Constitution. First, on the closing date of the public hearings, <br />unless rules are adopted on that date, no one knows what the <br />rules will be on July 1, 1992 with which they will be required to <br />comply. Further, the local government will have no authority <br />other than to permit development in the watersheds until such <br />time as these rules become effective and local ordinances are <br />adopted implementing the rules. At present, the deadline for the <br />approval by the Environmental Management Commission of county <br />ordinances is set at January 1, 1994. Until such time, a county <br />government will have no way to regulate the development which is <br />being continued in the watersheds. As such, these two paragraphs <br />should be amended to reflect that development is "grandfathered" <br />in on such date as the local ordinance is adopted and becomes <br />effective in each local jurisdiction. Additionally, the last <br />sentence of (t) which provides that if the local government <br />permits activities subsequent to the closing date of the public <br />hearings that the remainder of the jurisdiction will have to <br />compensate for these permits, violates the Equal Protection <br />Clause of the United States Constitution and the Law of the Land <br />Clause of the North Carolina Constitution insofar as it provides <br />for differing regulation of two identical pieces of property by <br />one government. <br />STATE - CONTROL OF LOCAL PROGRAMS <br />.0104(1), (w), and (x), together provide for intrusion on <br />the local government authority in violation of Article II, <br />Section 24 of the North Carolina Constitution limiting the <br />legislatures authority to enact local or private laws relating <br />to health and non - navigable streams. As the General Assembly <br />does not have the authority directly to control a local <br />government program dealing with a specific variance on a_given <br />Piece of property, it does not have the authority to vest the <br />Environmental Management Commission with the authority to <br />regulate the local program or permit variances on individual <br />tracts of land. Further, the attempt by an appointed <br />administrative agency of the executive branch of government to <br />control local legislative bodies is a violation of Separation of <br />Powers Clause of the North Carolina Constitution. Additionally, <br />the ability to grant variances for zoning appeals, is granted to <br />the local Board of Adjustment by G.S. § 153A -345. Any change <br />-2- <br />