Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
12 <br />Stancil continued reviewing the watershed <br />specific issues included in the report. <br />Stancil indicated that the issue of existing <br />development could also be a critical issue. <br />MOTION: Reid moved to recommend to the Board of <br />Commissioners that a representative be went <br />to the August 15 public hearing in Raleigh. <br />Seconded by Waddell. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />Board discussion indicated the following <br />issues should be addressed: <br />the Upper Eno Basin, a definition of <br />impervious surface that will allow the use of <br />the sliding scale as in University Lake <br />Watershed, the equity question of inter - <br />jurisdictional development, Haw Creek <br />industrial area be taken into consideration <br />for WS -IV, the use of Orange County's WQC of <br />one -half mile rather than one mile as <br />proposed by the State, South Hyco Oee: <br />issues, and campus restrictions for Jordan <br />Lake. <br />The concern was also expressed ;.ha;. Sep-ember <br />30, 1991 should not be the cutoff dame. Tt <br />was felt that this was insufficient notice <br />for developments already in process. <br />c. Planning Work -Plan <br />(1) Fiscal Impact Analysis <br />Marvin Collins informed the Board that this <br />analysis was based on a spreadsheet memplame <br />created by the University of Florida using <br />the "averaging approach ". P_ percapita cost <br />is figured using the cost of different <br />functions of the County and the population of <br />the County. Some of the Commissioners had <br />seen the spreadsheet analysis and had asked <br />Collins noted that another critical issue is <br />that of whether the County wants the <br />�JU <br />J�-Lj <br />responsibility role <br />of overseeing wet water <br />detention basins and <br />a monitoring program. <br />Another issue is the <br />clarification of the <br />definition of impervious <br />surface and the use <br />of a sliding scale. <br />Stancil indicated that the issue of existing <br />development could also be a critical issue. <br />MOTION: Reid moved to recommend to the Board of <br />Commissioners that a representative be went <br />to the August 15 public hearing in Raleigh. <br />Seconded by Waddell. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />Board discussion indicated the following <br />issues should be addressed: <br />the Upper Eno Basin, a definition of <br />impervious surface that will allow the use of <br />the sliding scale as in University Lake <br />Watershed, the equity question of inter - <br />jurisdictional development, Haw Creek <br />industrial area be taken into consideration <br />for WS -IV, the use of Orange County's WQC of <br />one -half mile rather than one mile as <br />proposed by the State, South Hyco Oee: <br />issues, and campus restrictions for Jordan <br />Lake. <br />The concern was also expressed ;.ha;. Sep-ember <br />30, 1991 should not be the cutoff dame. Tt <br />was felt that this was insufficient notice <br />for developments already in process. <br />c. Planning Work -Plan <br />(1) Fiscal Impact Analysis <br />Marvin Collins informed the Board that this <br />analysis was based on a spreadsheet memplame <br />created by the University of Florida using <br />the "averaging approach ". P_ percapita cost <br />is figured using the cost of different <br />functions of the County and the population of <br />the County. Some of the Commissioners had <br />seen the spreadsheet analysis and had asked <br />