Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-26-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:43:46 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r -NIC'o Newly Proposed Watershed Protection Rules <br />Problems & TJCQC's R commendations <br />T) Fwlsting Devclopment - Dciinition and Grandfatbering <br />dhAFT <br />�r1/2, _,Z�; s,� 6 <br />Currently, the dcfi or under construcllon ( with <br />si6nifirant rcaollrces "Fended ) or projects platted by 9 /30/91. <br />This definition will be used to clpgiify watershc -ds; <br />- Local govcrnmcnts arc to brim existir+ noA -LM( rmi usi :s i►tl0 �`currYliantti as practicable; and <br />- All ncw.P&tiyi.ky is to comply with the watershed proLectioll rules. <br />The proposed definition of existing development is compleW.0 developinent, platted developinctitt and <br />zoned develpoVment tts Of the closing _date of is : f!uV i r tO 1991). <br />This definition would be used to classify waLershods tL _ rondfather or exempt ftycloLynent fresm <br />+1,r 1 paters cd rr&ction regulations, <br />Pr ON <br />1. It i5 tnapproprialc io tisc existing zortirrg of Vacant laral either• to ClassifyYrx:lC►5hcdt' or to exempt d�zrelojirnenl <br />from rules. <br />2, l_)cfirr.ir:s zoning as existing develoim+ent for- the put posers of lhcsc rule , muy Na u burl l-,-gal precedent for local <br />s;o.}crrznret :is' fi�turez rc�t.iatoryactinnq. <br />3. The Soplcneber30th i1wi linernnim arve:rul probleyns. Flnit It would be difffctell, if riot intpoz;siblc, fur lucxrl <br />Smerntrronis io invenfory cornplefed deucloptirm1, platied i+roja:l , anus zorted lund Ly Selrtr nbcr 0th. Second, <br />ihough local gover•rtruents must eorrrply untie the rules for +:ll uGtivilic5 IWS -ttn after SeTternber 30111, theij will not <br />know how th dr watcrrihM is classilied or tvhal rules apply until July 1,1;392. rinally, as written, the rules may <br />pid local gover•rrrrrents in a IegaI or polilical bind; tfiotgh Ow rules say it ae elopntrnl niust cotnpl y with the <br />u+afershed protection rules beginning Se pleinbe'r 301h, rurw local governinents have froth Jr4li 1993 <br />to January 1994 to adopl Choir, local ordirkow s (cLependhi on the size of tltt Slrtce Ic)r:ulSuuernnrratt5 <br />must Approve r protVsed projects that mcci current ordirrancr s; tlwy could riot reiluire to cur"Plt/ urltl: <br />regulations d ,fo adoption by that jurisdiction. <br />The ru.lew o f for a difficrult Hulutiun to this bind: If a local goverwiient t41Yprrit,d i a "rzc,n-c :orz fonnin use," it rrit[y t <br />offset the irnlraets by implertsertfing more stringent ragifI reincrtls elsewhcrr in. the wuto-shed. <br />RF•.CQMMM11A.TIONTe <br />Revise the roles as follows. <br />0104(s) Existing develops -m%L, as defined for the purpose of these rulest rnealts projects already <br />completed or in progress as dcmonetrated by SignlfiCant re50urcc6 havin& beeat expr•c1Qcd on the <br />project, or prejccts with a recorded plat praivar, fpl- stn T1 1 a <br />Ttlly L19__92.. <br />Note: Triangle J recommends ootabbshinsd a vesLed rl6lrl duadline as early as leEally possible to avoid -a <br />rush" of plan approvals which would not meet the spirit of the law. <br />2) New Development - Compliance wiLh Rll1cA and Vur)'axiceo <br />The C1srrent rules Allow exemptlorts of minor non- conforinln6 uses prior to reclassification in order to <br />achieve a higher Classification; after classification, nc.w devclopinent is required to uJinply with the <br />rufos beginnins September 30, 1991. <br />The proposed rules would Allow exemptions for non- confori7'cin6 uw.s prior to tincl rrftCr reclassificaLlon. <br />1ED FROM 9195499390 t 08.26.1991 11 +03 P. 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.