Orange County NC Website
STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC HEARING CALLED BY THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD <br />OF COMMISSIONERS, August 26, 1991, at the County Courthouse in <br />Hillsborough, regarding PROPOSED STATE WATERSHED <br />CLASSIFICATIONS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. <br />IMPACT ON ISSUES 1990 -92, WATER RESOURCES, The League supports: <br />"-ftringent contra# toprntect the gualiti- ol`current andpaten %al drkkrng- <br />R-fter Yvpplie,�; Including,nrntectinn Of watershedslnr Supplies and <br />c7�'recharge areaslnrgrnund- water. <br />The League of Women Voters of Chapel Hill and Carrboro thanks you for the <br />opportunity to speak at this public hearing. <br />The League of Women Voters, nationally, has been a strong advocate of <br />water quality protection for more than three decades. Our position has been <br />that the best, most effective and most economical means of maintaining <br />drinking water quality is by protection at the sources of supply, <br />Locally, the League has made statements on several occasions regarding the <br />protection of University Lake watershed, including the public hearing <br />(December 16, 1987) of the Environmental Management Commission, <br />regarding granting WS -1 status to University Lake as a source of drinking <br />water and at the public meeting (February 2, 1959) called by the Division of <br />Environmental Management, <br />On August 15, 1991, Margaret Holton spoke for the League of Women Voters <br />of North Carolina at a public hearing in Raleigh sponsored by the <br />Environmental Management Commission, The position of the League of <br />Woven Voters of North Carolina is for W IER_SUPPLY PRQT CTION THAT <br />WILL PREVENT.EQLLUTION, <br />The local League supports: <br />L The proposed WS -II classification of University Lake and Cane Creek <br />watersheds. We would favor the even more restrictive Cr Itical Watc s, hed <br />designation for University Lake, due to its special vulnerability, as <br />documented by the Camp Dresser and McKee Study and supported by <br />stringent local actions taken by Carrboro and Orange County. It is important <br />that the presently strong University Lake protection not be weakened by <br />future local actions. University Lake watershed must remain <br />predominantely undeveloped. <br />