Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-26-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-26-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:43:46 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
354
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA <br />LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA COMMENTS <br />PUBLIC HEARINGS N.C. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION(EMC) <br />PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATIONS AND AMENDMENTS TO RULES FOR SURFACE <br />WATER SUPPLY WATERSHEDS PURSUART TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF HB 156 <br />August 15,1991 at Raleigh, N.C. <br />The League of Women Voters of N.C. strongly supports State <br />Government role as set forth in HB 156 and worked for its passage <br />in the 1989 Legislature. HB 156, Water Supply Watershed <br />Protection Act, established a cooperative program between the <br />state and local governments to protect and enhance the quality <br />of state "ace Water Drinkin Water .S lies..6 �y <br />6ae commend t hard work of the Environment-at Ma Bement Commission <br />that passed good regulations in December 1990 after the recommen- <br />dations of the Water Supply Watershed Protection Advisory Council. <br />We do not want to see them weakened. HB 156 was written without <br />a stated goal but we suggest a goal of "Minimal degradation over <br />the next 20 ears" which has been stated as a goal is several <br />water quality reservoir studies in the state. <br />The recommended four proposed Water Supply Classifications provide <br />flexibility for local governments to provide the highest water <br />protection possible depending on their local watershed character- <br />istics. It is suggested that the state use the term "Most Protective <br />Appropriate" classification. Water Supply Watersheds of local <br />governments that have already reached the higher classifications <br />should automatically continue in that protective class. It will <br />be important to encourage local governments to write local ordi- <br />nances that.will provide a protective land use plan for their <br />present and future water supplies. Citizens need to take part <br />in forming the watershed ordinance and to know that regulations <br />in a protective local ordinance once adopted will continue to <br />be in place. <br />Lc=al governments that have responsibility_for a protection program <br />for a portion of a watershed in their jurisdiction, but not their <br />water supply, should work regionally with that water supply govern- <br />ment through interlocal agreement which should include monitoring. <br />The position of the League of Women Voters of North Carolina <br />is for WATER SUPPLY PROTECTION THAT WILL PREVENT POLLUTION. <br />1. Ne support the one --mile Critical Area as well as the five -mile <br />Protected .Area. <br />. _. <br />2. We support the rules on wastewater discharges and limits on <br />development densities. The most effective practice for highest <br />water protection is low density development particularly in the <br />Critical and Protected areas. Stormwater flowing across impervious <br />surfaces such as roof tons, parsing lots and roads picks up pollut- <br />ants that can result in serious impact on water quality. Buffer <br />zones are also needed to prevent damage from episodic events <br />such as spills and extra heavy storm run -off. <br />3. We support the 100 foot buffers on perennial streams. <br />801 Oberlin Road SUIte 325 Raleigh, N.C. 27605 919/839 -5532 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.