Orange County NC Website
0-� <br />ENIC "' Nr:wly Proposed Watershed Protection ]Rules <br />Problems & TJCOC's Rcconuliendalions <br />i) RX150ng Developa-Vent - Dcfit%ition and t: 3randfalherla %g <br />-JhA1FY <br />Currently, the fide nfion existin dev 1 n C_ t is pi <br />4.7mpletud or under Constructioll ( With <br />significant resources capended ) or projects platicd by 9/30/91. <br />- 77,ifi definition will be used to c_ lA" watersheds; <br />- Local governments are to brim exlstJng non -confoa tr,i� uses into evrr:pliallm u8 Practicable; and <br />- <br />All t%ew PSOyl.ty is to comply with the wsaterbhcd pro lectio1i ruh:5. <br />The proposed definition of existing dcvcl0p1-r %C11t is C0117p1Ct4i1 ck.vcluPlt%crlt, platted development, an <br />zoned devel m n pf the closing, dale pf U:c��u�►]ic li4((rirl ; ( �ternb ur ;10, 7997 <br />- This defin1,6011 would be used to classify walcrsl�eds All 1 ratxifuthcr or uxemvt elo omcnt from <br />�e �V��,r„�rvl%GCi prc�tccti0n re�ul�tionS. <br />j'r•nblertfs <br />1. It is inappropriate to use existing zoning of vacant land either to classify watersheds.• or to exempt developrnernl <br />from rules. <br />2, l�cfxrxirsg zoning as existing d loprrrwtt fir the E�u►Fr��ac:s of (lr(;iu r( <Icti mud s(:t u bur! le al precetierit for local <br />,s;ovornnie nts' future rc t�latnry actions. <br />3. The Seplattiber 301h datdline ix,y' timerul problems. Fint it would be dl f ficull, If not inlro Bible, for laud <br />govoYnmenta io irnwittory completed develop"Fard, 171411ed projects, and zorrrei Lund by ScThunber 90th. Second, <br />though local governments tratrst comply with t1W rules for all acth tu:i 1'esw i u ftm- September 30th, they will not <br />know how their watershed is classified or what rul(,N arq Zy until July 1, 1992. finally, as written, the rules rrtay <br />put local governincrite its a legal or political Lind: though the rules say a des elolrrrtcnt must comply with the <br />watershed protection rules beginning Seplernber 301h, rusw legit L -4tion says local Soverninents have from July 1993 <br />to Jarnua►y 1991 to adopt their- local ordinaricay opt the size 011he jurlsdiclion). Since local guuJrrrnents <br />rnt4st altprove r proposed projMo that nneet curyertt 0r'din4?'Ce6; they could riot require dt ipdopm to curnplli with <br />regulations »floe io adoption by that jurisdiction, <br />Thy rul(b offer•a difficult w1wHon to this bind: If a local governtnenl apprgve'i u "non -G(ni forTnin 1.5e,•l t1 emus% <br />offset the irtilrrtcts by irriplertieniing rrtorc stringent rcgtfirerneuls el+(ru)hcrc in the watershed. <br />RE COMM l'lh DATIONi <br />Revise the roles its follows: <br />0144(6) Existing development, as defiued for the purpose of these rules, means projects already <br />Completed or in progress as demonstrated br signlfieant resources having beet% expended on the <br />project, or projects with a recorded plat_gX_A ,1s,fssa�ylrlcl► _ 98ki- l�x1ght hini b� cn esl;eblished as of <br />July7.r. <br />Note._ Triangle J recommends el.tablishing a veslcd right deadline as early a5 legally possible to avc)id "a <br />rush" of flan approvals which would not tnect the spirit of the law. <br />2) New Development - Corkipliance with Rules Mattel Varian(;t-tt <br />The Current rules allow exemptions of rnai,lor non- canfortn1116 uses Prior to recIassification 11t order to <br />achieve a higher classification; after classification, ncw• dcvelopl %tent 15 ""VirGd to L'vinply with the <br />ruloQ beginning September 30, 1991, <br />The proposed rules would allow exemptions for non- coltf0r-iriJn6 uses prior to anti lifter reclassification. <br />JED FROM 9195499390 t 08.26.1991 11:03 P. 1 <br />