|
911
<br />-1
<br />--. ■
<br />,'(*"K NT PW)rF:T)1JRE5: All persons interested in or potentially affected by this natter are invited to attend the public
<br />twarings being noticed herein. Convents, data, stat.emats and other information may be saatmitted in writing prior to, during
<br />or within thirty (30) days after the date of the last public hearing. Written public cements will be accepted, therefore,
<br />Lhrcugo September 30, 1991 inclusive. Convents miry also be presented =rally at the hearings. so that all persons desiring
<br />to speak may have an opportunity to do so, the length of verbal statasieots may be limited at the discretion of the hearing
<br />officers. The statutor7 autbcrity for these actioDS is as follows: I.C. General Statutes 143 - 214.1, 143 - 214.5,
<br />143- 215.3(a)(1) and (3). The proposed effective date of the final acted water supply classifications and standards rules
<br />is March 1, 1992. ALL IFrf>`RPM AND P07ERrI,1LLY AFFECTED PERSO0 OR PARTIES ARE STROMY EWXMRAM TO READ 'THE DrMt
<br />PUBLIC NOTICE AS PUBLISHED ZK THE JUNE 14, 1991 NORM CAROLID REGLTM AND TO 091M ADDITIMIL DrFORADITICK ON THESE
<br />PROPOSALS AS INDICATED BELOW.
<br />EXPLANATION OF NOTICE: There are two types of changes being proposed as new revisions to the rules. The first type of
<br />revisions are clarifications of language. An exile of this type of change is the prof i revisions of the narrative
<br />descriptions for point source discharges for WS -II, WS -III and IBS -IV classifications is rule 151 NGC 2B .0211, subparagraphs
<br />(d)(2), (e)(2) and (f)(2), respectively. The second type of new proposed revisions are more subatantive changes which involve
<br />several major issues. Determining what. aastitutes "existing development" for the purposes of impleeentioq these roles; that
<br />is, determining at what point in their development planned or proposed projects may be %raadfathererd" under these rules, is
<br />one such major issue. A definition of existing develop=ment which is intended to address this issue is proposed at rule 15A
<br />NCAC 2B .0104 (s) . SPECTF lC CagKENTS ON THE XKPLEPMMTICK OF THE DEFINITION OF ECLTr G DEVELOPP[E T IS PROPOSED Dl RULE 151
<br />NCAC 2B .0104(s) ARE BEING SOLICITED, WHETHER IN FAVOR OF OR OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSAL. Anot.hrs major isaae for which comments
<br />are being solicited is the definition of the critical area for a water supply reaervo.ir (151 NCAC 2B .0202(14)). The
<br />definition of the critical area for a water supply resertoir was adopted by the ENC on Deaeirber 13, 1990. Altbmvb this is
<br />an adopted provision of the water supply protection rules and is not a Dew proposal, the definition of the critical area for
<br />a water supply reservoir cootiaues to be controversial. Therefore, THE ENC IS SPECIPICILLY SOLICITIX CClrl1>IJYlS Od THE
<br />DEFINITICIR OF CRITICAL AM FOR WATER SUPPLY RESERVOIRS, W MM THE CWMMS IRE 33 FAVOR OF OR OPPOSM TO THE DEFINITION.
<br />F URTMMU, COMENTS IRE BEIM SOLICITED BY THE EMC CE THE EIVifiO1 MMIL, EC - EEC Alm SOCIAi. COSTS LID BENEFITS OF M AND
<br />ALL OF THE PROVISIONS OF THESE RULES, WHETHER THE C'IRlSf3Fl5 IRE lX FAVOR OF OR OPPOSED TO ?ME RULES AND WHEMM 'PFf CCRO MS
<br />ARE ON THE NEW PROPOSED RF:V7SIOKS, THE PROVIMONS OF THE RULES ADOPTED BY THE ENC OR DECEMBER 13, 1990 OR OR THE MS71M
<br />WATER SUPPLY PROTEC710E RULES. C13103rfS AR$ ALSO BEING SOLICITED ON THE PROPOSED CLLSSMCATIONS OF EACH SURFACE WATER
<br />SUPPLY, ESPECIALLY DMUDIM IllFO MTICZ 'THAT MAY HAVE IN INFLUEIM ON TIM FML CLLSS trrCLTICBI ASSIGRMI T. Water supply
<br />reclassifications are proposed for surface voters of the Broad River Basin, Cape Fear River Basin, Catawba River Basin,
<br />French Broad River Basin, Hiwassee River Basin, Little Tenn me River Basin, Lasaher River Basi.D, Neuae River Basin, New
<br />River Basin; Pasgootank River Basin, Roanoke River Basin, Sava mb River Basin, Tar- Pmaiico River Basin, Watauga River Hasid
<br />and the Yadkin River Basin. CMUM ARE B®G EXPREMLY SOLICITED BY THE EPIC ON 07 IND III OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
<br />NOTICE, WHETHER THE CCPIU'RTS ARE IN FAVOR OF OR OPPOSED TO ANY OR ILL PROVISIONS OF THIS 1+1MCE. The ENC is soliciting these
<br />Comments so that THE EMC 12Y ADOPT MORE OR LESS S'T MEW W M SUPPLY PROTECTION AND NMOEWT REOUIREFEMIS TH1T MAY DIPPER
<br />FROM THOSE BEING PROPOSED, IF THE ENC DET£ROMS 7W = FILL LU P= RULES ME A L06ICLL OUTM ORH OF THE PUBLIC NOTICE,
<br />HEARIBM AND PUBLIC C" R'TS RECEIVED. 1]1 of the rev ens to these rules, if they are adopted by the ENC as proposed, are
<br />expected to boom effective an Narch 1, 1992.
<br />AU'11i0RIT'Y: N.C. General Statutes 143- 214.1, 143 - 214.5, 143- 215.3(a)(1) and (3).
<br />rNFORMATI01i. Further information on the final propnea]s my be obtained by writing or calliDg:
<br />Stephen Zoufaly.
<br />Division of Enviromental Manage t
<br />P.O. Box 29535
<br />Raleigh, North Carolina 27626 -0535
<br />(919) 733 -5083
<br />Uate Dr. tGeorge If. E erett, Director
<br />
|