Orange County NC Website
ri <br />B. VACATION AND SICK LEAVE REVISIONS "TO THE PERSONNEL ORDINANCE <br />Human Resources Director Elaine Holmes reported on the <br />proposed revisions to the Vacation Leave and Sick Leave sections of the <br />Orange County Personnel Ordinance. <br />The vacation leave earning proposal would provide for all <br />permanent employees vacation leave earning based on total county service <br />without the five year waiting period. This involves three employees. <br />On the maximum accumulation for vacation leave this change <br />would provide that vacation leave may accumulate without a maximum until <br />January 31 at which time any excess would be canceled. Upon <br />termination, the maximum amount paid would be 240 hours. <br />With regard to the sick leave policy, this change would allow <br />an employee to transfer sick leave and eliminates the current fifteen <br />(15) day limit. <br />The County Commissioners asked that further information be <br />provided on the following items: <br />1. The number of people who would be affected by the change <br />in the sick leave policy. <br />2. Financial analysis of what the changes to Section 5.3.1, <br />5.4 and 6.5 will cost. <br />3. The number of employees who have 240 days accumulated. <br />C. IMPACT FEES FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL FACILITIES <br />John Link and Planning Director Marvin Collins reported on the <br />issues involved in developing an impact fee structure for school capital <br />needs in Orange County. It is hoped that a system of fees can be <br />thoroughly discussed and ready for implementation next July 1. One <br />concern is that whatever fees may be established that they be <br />established in such a way that the cost that new development generates <br />is borne by new development and at the same time not passed on to <br />existing development. <br />In answer to a question from Commissioner Gordon, Marvin <br />Collins explained that in terms of the offsets, as part of the process <br />of establishing fees a decision would need to be made as to the type of <br />facilities the Board wants to finance with these fees. He explained <br />that benefits could be approached in three ways: (1) County as a whole, <br />(2) school districts, or (3) more specific to the types of schools. <br />There could be two geographical zones where in one zone impact fees <br />would not be charged and in the other zone they would be charged. <br />Commissioner Willhoit stated that it may be that the policies of <br />the two school districts in allowing for the transfer of students may <br />affect the County's ability to do it on a countywide basis. He noted <br />that the cost of providing classroom space for one child in the school <br />system is from $8,000 to $12,000. He questioned why the County could <br />not assess a fee of $1,000 per residence and proceed on that basis <br />making it countywide. <br />Geoffrey Gledhill stated that they may need to separate the <br />two districts because the development in the Chapel Hill - Carrboro school <br />district does not impact the capital needs of the Orange County school <br />district. <br />Chair Carey stated that the need is different in each school <br />