Agenda - 08-20-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 6 r UPPER ENO: Perhaps the Upper Eno WS 2 classification should be north of highway 70, since the Seven ,Mile Creek area is also the area under consideration for economic development. IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: Orange County definitions differentiate between gravel and paved surfaces; also, we use a sliding scale to determine the 6% impervious surface ratio. We would like to continue to do this rather than use the state system. EQUITY: .lust as the equity issue was raised in Cane Creek discussions, so it must be in other watersheds... how will the Durham or other water usage affect landowners in Little River, for example? What compensation should there be? HAW CREEK: The Orange County portion of this watershed is already industrial. Will there be an intrajurisdictional allocation of development? Can the rest of this area be built out as industrial? WQCA: The Orange County Area is preferable to Orange County definition quality will most lik would put more land into better protection of the definition of a Water Quality Critical the state one -mile proposal because the is based on a rationale of how the water ely be affected. The state regulations the WQCA but not necessarily afford water. SOUTH HYCO CREEK: The part of this watershed in Orange County is different from how it is used in Person County. The classification should reflect this or questions of equity should be addressed. WATER DETENTION BASIN MONITORING: Who is to monitor the water detention basins if there is a best - management practice put into place? EXISTING DEVELOPMENT: September 30 should not be the cut -off date for determining existing development. While some developer may use the "window" for building in the watershed, it would not be reasonable or fair to limit building until regulations are finally determined as late as 1994. UNC CAMPUS RESTRICTIONS: The County should take the opportunity to show its advocacy and support of the university. a7'j -� M&U"'