Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
i. Name of Watershed: 'reuse — Little Pivpr <br />2. IM-me and address of Jurisdiction: � A %." <br />cto PRA', : . ',JNTY FLA':Nl:, <br />P.C. rCx8181 <br />Hll rrnnn ^u Ij <br />3. Contact person and phone nu-atr-; tar. v i r. Lc i i i r, s , -C i recto' <br />Gp�e `•ell, Plannerl11, 7;7 - "1F1 ::75n9, <br />4. Total acreage of the ware -shed In vot jL-- isdletion (ETJ includedj: <br />5. Total acreage of the watershed in the Cririeal Area that i% r .K;ei,iai I <br />6. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical AMa that is residenc zl: 1 1 E� <br />7. Total acrtage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non- residendal: :e <br />8. Total acreage of the water -shed outside of the Critical Area that is non - residential: I 1 I < <br />19. Does your jurisdiction currently have Stormwater Control Devices in use vnul n <br />residential watershed a -tars? j No <br />10. Does your ju.-isdiction cl;rrently have Stormwater Control Devices in use w:dun �- <br />j non- residenrial watershed areas? I '+o <br />1 11. Existing residential density . the Cr:acal Area: I <br />12. Local government intent for fur= residential development in the C -*cal Area: I NA <br />i 13. Existing residential density outside of the Critical Arcs: i < 1 au /Zac <br />14, Local govt.- ntnent intent for -u=c residential development outside of I 1 du /tae <br />I the Critical Am?.: I <br />115. Local Gov- -=tr-t rntert for futurt non- residenmal develop:acnt in the I <br />I Cr;tical A--ez: I NA <br />16. Local govcraacar intent for fu.LTt non- resid=21 development outside of rite <br />Criiical Area' I � 1; <br />i7. Total acreage of fa.=land within Your patron of the wa=shed: I zz.88D <br />119. P--rcezmp of the total watershed located within a state paxk or mvional pazk/fomst: I NA <br />19. L1 yOl1= ap:su0r., WIIat watershed G18ist5 -aIIOII would tl]e wat. -•shed ourlify for ' - <br />! tinder the adopted Rule? 1 VS- I I <br />I <br />120. 'What ciassificadon would your local gtrrernmeat preer for the wa=hed? 'rxptain. I <br />1:S -11 is consistent with existing oevelooment patterns, land use plan, and <br />CDr study recommendations. CDn study was commissioned by Durham City /Coun.ty. <br />Classification is also consistent with previous resolutions aeopted by <br />Durham City /County and presented to Orange County governing board. <br />*Does not include the road /highway systeti which averages 7.3 acres per mile. <br />i <br />I utpoa-7�ag tgpa ' Da uc. lz= <br />d 1/91 <br />IF <br />