Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
C:.I <br />g�Y��JI.��. <br />:._r <br />NameofWatershed: Cape Fear - noraan Creek /University Lake <br />r� <br />N=t and address of jurisdiction: ORANGE COUNTY <br />1 <br />I2. <br />c/o ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT <br />P.O. BOX F'01 <br />j, Con- a::p- 5ona:,6 phone nC. t >= rtarvin collins, Director, 7374E 1,�! X25;2 <br />Gene Sell, Planner III, 737 -P181 X2589 <br />14, Total a=agc of the wataShed in you: jt^isdietion (rTJ inciuded): <br />115 ' <br />,12� r 1 <br />;. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is residential: <br />I 221 <br />6, TOLL acreage of the wit -shed outside of the Critical A.--ea that is residen::a1-. <br />I 1,857 <br />17. Total acrragc of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non - residential: <br />S. Total aizreage of the watershed outside of tae Critical Area that is non - residential: <br />19. Does you: jurisdiction cu.-rcntly have Sto:mwate: Control Devices in use withL--t <br />residential watcshed areas? <br />I No <br />10. Does your jursdicdon c", -.ntly have Sto :mwate: Con =l Devices in use vr.Lhin <br />I� <br />non - residential waL shed ereas? <br />No <br />j 11. Exist ng residential density in tie Citical Pwaa: .. ' II ".. <br />kl du/2ac 1 <br />12. Local Bove ^meat insect fo: future residential d- velopmens in the C meal Pzca: <br />j. ldu /2ac <br />13..?xiszag residental density outside of the Critical Are: <br />1(1 du /2ac <br />14, L xcal government inten: for future residential development outside of <br />I� <br />I the C :ical Area: <br />K1du /2ac <br />115. Local GOVeTL =t inter:', for future nun- r,rsidcntial development in the <br />l <br />1a�.ticaiAmz: <br />I o� <br />- 116, Local gover =ent intent fe: futtre non- residtztial development outside of tae <br />J <br />- itical A.-ca. <br />I M: <br />17. Total aceagc of fti-=land within your portion of the wata:shtd: <br />18. Pccentage of the tntal wr=shed heated within a stem park or national parkJfarest•. I NA <br />119. in your opiniotu wha: vra -stied clacsi5cation would the w'= sheen for <br />under the adopted Rule? I ws -1 1 <br />20, Wnat classi5na on would your local government prefer for the watershed? rx?laia. <br />WS -II is consistent with existing development patterns and local <br />government /utility provider (OWASA) plans for the area. <br />*Does not include the road /highway system which averages 7.3 acres per mile. <br />'7 9 <br />lAutng Date Sut::ntitec <br />v 1/91 <br />i <br />