Agenda - 08-05-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

4 wr .l a W Existing residennai density in the Critical Area: I N/A Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: I N/A Existing residentita density outside of the Critical Are' J1D -U. /Ac 14. Local government intent for future residential development outside of 121). U. /Ac the Critical Area: 15. Local Government intent for future non - residential development in the I I N/A Critical Area: 16. Local Lovernmcnt intent for future non - residential development outside of the j 25% Critical .Area: — -- - -- - - -- 17. Total acreage of - =nland within, your portion of the watershed: 1 100 18. Percentage of the total , atcrshecl located within a state park or national park /forest: 1 .0 19. In your opinion. �xnat watershed classification would the watershed qualify for Iv under the adopted Rule' - -- '- - _....._........I _.... 20. What classification Nvouid your local government prefer for the watershed? Explain. Due to water and sever availability in a major portion of this area and being adjacent to I- 85/I -40; there is significant non - residential development and it is anticipated that further non - residential develop - ment will occur in the future. The City has zoned much of this area ad- jacent to I- 85/I -40 for manufacturing purposes. The City of Mebane would prefer a Class IV classification due to this anticipated non - residential development. It is also noted that there is presently not a eater supply or intake on the Haw Creek. son Feb. 28, 1991 _ Dt+te S : :brn.ttcd 0 1 'Watershed Cassification Criteria 11. Name or\Vntersncc ,n- Creek Cit; o: "';eoane 106 E. Washington St. Mebane, NC 27302 3. Contact person ;:nd phone number. Robert L. Wilson, City Manager :. Total acreage of the watershed in Your;unsdiction (ET1 included): 3076 5. Total acreage of the %atershcd in the Critical Area that is residential: I 0 6. Total acreage of the wzicrshcd outside of the Critical Area that is residential: I 624 7. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Are2 that is non - residential: y 'I I - 0 - -� S. Total acreage of the �k ater shed outside of the Critical Area that is non-residential: 382 9. Does your jurisctC : :on cur7cntl r have Storrnwater Control Devices in use within I NO residential wzt_ -,ShLd 10. Does your jurisdiction currently have Stormw•ater Control Devices in use within 1 NO non - residential watershed areas? W Existing residennai density in the Critical Area: I N/A Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: I N/A Existing residentita density outside of the Critical Are' J1D -U. /Ac 14. Local government intent for future residential development outside of 121). U. /Ac the Critical Area: 15. Local Government intent for future non - residential development in the I I N/A Critical Area: 16. Local Lovernmcnt intent for future non - residential development outside of the j 25% Critical .Area: — -- - -- - - -- 17. Total acreage of - =nland within, your portion of the watershed: 1 100 18. Percentage of the total , atcrshecl located within a state park or national park /forest: 1 .0 19. In your opinion. �xnat watershed classification would the watershed qualify for Iv under the adopted Rule' - -- '- - _....._........I _.... 20. What classification Nvouid your local government prefer for the watershed? Explain. Due to water and sever availability in a major portion of this area and being adjacent to I- 85/I -40; there is significant non - residential development and it is anticipated that further non - residential develop - ment will occur in the future. The City has zoned much of this area ad- jacent to I- 85/I -40 for manufacturing purposes. The City of Mebane would prefer a Class IV classification due to this anticipated non - residential development. It is also noted that there is presently not a eater supply or intake on the Haw Creek. son Feb. 28, 1991 _ Dt+te S : :brn.ttcd 0