Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-05-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:46:37 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
648
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
!�. , <br />--A - <br />Waesxl;d Cxasxfx�atxon Criteria <br />ame of Watershed: (Excluding Lake Mi Chi a and <br />Falls of the Neuse Watershed (Little Rj.yer Reservoir Watershed <br />". Name and address of Jurisdiction: City of Durham <br />it Durham City- County Planning Department <br />101 City Hall Plaza <br />I Durham, NC 27701 <br />13. Contact person and phone number: <br />Keith Luck, Principal Planner (919) 560 -4137 <br />4. Total acreage of the watershed in your jurisdiction (ETJ included): <br />; 18,100 <br />5. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is residential: <br />I NA <br />6. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is residential: <br />1 12,000 <br />7. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non-residential: <br />i NA <br />8. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is non - residential: <br />2,200 <br />19. Does your jurisdiction currently have Stormwater Control Devices in use within <br />j residential watershed areas? <br />I No <br />10. Does your jurisdiction currently have Sto- mwater Control Devices in use within <br />non - residential watershed areas? <br />I No <br />11. Existing residential density in the Critical Area: <br />NA <br />12, Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: <br />_ <br />j NA <br />13. Existing residential density outside of the Critical Area: <br />j> 2 u/a <br />14, Local government intent for future residential development outside of <br />h <br />I the Critical Area: <br />I> 2 u/ a <br />15. Local Government intent for future non - residential development in the <br />Critical Arta: <br />NA <br />j 16- Local govenmen: intent for future non- residenaai development outside of th,; <br />j <br />15 % <br />i C:,tical Area: <br />17. Total acreage of fa.- inland within your pordon of the watershed: <br />18. Percentage of the total watershed located within a state park or national pazk/forest: <br />I WS I V <br />19. In your opinion, what watershed classification would the watershed qualijly for <br />under the adopted Rule? <br />20. What classification would your local government prefer for the watershed? Explain. <br />WSIV. Because current and future land uses in the watershed include <br />very high intensity development, specifically downtown Durham <br />and numerous commercial, industrial office and high density <br />residential developments. <br />* See note (on attached cover letter) about non - residential acreage. <br />I <br />1 - <br />March 7, 1991 <br />Date Suomi.,. ,ec <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.