Agenda - 08-05-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

i . ^ .5 +, .■ yr... ��.. •`+•'C::�yN�,�+,i•�- X.; ...... ,��.. i."• w�, .rd'Y�.i :' ;r:. "t S �� .: Q �r i"�w'�„��°r' +�vs�. :�s . �r.?fi, ��7w.M�. �.b�o -.err K „r IS &ze• :. •r°y. '•mac. � . �iy � -.'.• 1. NatneTcr atershed: -41 Back Creek L. 1\cnte and adcress of J:: ' diction: City of Graham II PO Drawer 357 e Graham, M 27253 13. Contact person and phony number. Chris *11rs 919- 228 -8362 G. hotel acreage o` the watershed in your jurisdiction {=TJ included): � n/8 5. Total acreage of the wai�rshed in the Critical Area that is residential: I n a I 5, Total acreage of the wet rshed outside of the Critical Arra that is residential: n/x r_I 17. Total acreage of the wz:Prshed in the Critical Area that is non - reside ;tial: I n/a i I g, Total acreage of the wa=shcd outside of the Critical Area that _s non - residential: n/a 9. Does you- jursdittion ci:.;er.ay have Storrnwa:er Con�ol Dsviccs in use wi;nin I Na residential watershed areas I� 110. Does you- jurisdiction csrrently have Storrnwater, Conz o1 Devices in use within r. /a �I non - residential watershed' .eas? 11. Existing residential density in the Critical Area: I n/a I Local roverrment iat: for future residential deveiop.:,ent in the Critical Area: I n/a I i3, EXiStiZg residential d sity outside of the Critical Area: I n/a 1 14. Local government imgnt for future. residential dev60 vent outside o.` i n/a I th,z ice_ /w I _. II 15. Local Coverntrent intl nt for future non - residential deveiop:ner.; in the i Na 115. l,o,.ai governmcrn int int for future non - residential develooment outside of the I n/a, Cri--cal Area: I i7. Total ac:ease of farmland within your portion of the watershed: I n/e 1- i S. Percentage of the IOt4 watenhcd located wit:-dn a state park or national park/fores :: o 1r. your opinior., what watershed classi5cation would tae watershed qualify for under the adopted Rule? ; I 120, W :a; classification: would yc= loc,,1 gover- ..:ner; prefer :c: the watershc47 Explain. I The City of Graham s no jurisdiction ;x: the Back Creek watershed; nowever, we are a 2/3 awne= f the Reservol. and water Tree -.vent Plat With the + C_ty of Mebane ow;tYt}g the µ,.her 1/3. Based on prelim nary = nnformat=n we nave and the wet rshed classifications we believe the watershed will realify for a W-S -II The Cities of Graham and t-ezane have always straved to trcrvide tra best �4er quality as pmsible and hope writ:. ::rte help of A?arrance County, haiRiver, Green revel art= ;,Once Cotn,ty, a W� II Can b= obtained ;.o con- ue = provide aualwry water :o= years to.C::re. I ) I / I