Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-05-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:46:37 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
648
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Watershed Classification Criteria <br />1. NamecfWatershed= Lake Cammack (Stoney Creek) <br />?. Name and address of Jurisdiction: <br />County of Alamance j <br />124 W. Elm Street <br />Graham NC 27253 <br />3; Contact person and phone number: <br />Richard L. Honeycutt 919 -226 -1312 <br /><. Total acreage of the watershed in your jurisdiction (ETJ included): II 40,174 <br />5. -Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is residential: <br />16. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is residential <br />7. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non residential: <br />5o <br />S. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is non - residential: <br />19. Does vour jurisdiction currently have Storm, Control Devices to use withm <br />I NO <br />residential watershed areas? <br />110, Does your jurisdiction currently have Stormwater Control Devices in use within No <br />non - residential watershed areas? <br />11. Existing residential density in the Critical Area: I <lAV /2AC <br />_J <br />I <br />1 2,012 <br />12. Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: I lnv /2AC <br />13. Existing residential density outside of the Critical Area: (1ov /2AC <br />I 14. 1~)cal government intent for future residential development outside of El <br />I low /AC <br />the Critical Area: i <br />15. Local Government intent for furure non - residential development in the ILVmited <br />Crirical Area: <br />7 6. Local government intent for future non - residential development outside of the ILimiLed <br />I <br />Critical Area: <br />17. Total acreage of fanniand within your portion of the watershed: <br />11S. Percenmge of the total watershed located within a state park or national park/forest: I 0 <br />1 19. In your opinion, what watershed classincatian would the watershed ouaiify for <br />under the adopted Rule? <br />20. What classification would your local government prefer for the watershed? Explain. <br />I ws ::: <br />ws I1 I <br />Lake Cammack currently has 1432 dwelling units'on 40,114 acres or 28 acres <br />per unit. The critical area is already regulated at 1 unit per 80,000 <br />square feet. it is anticipated that development will occur slowly due to <br />poor soils and lack of transportation. The Board of Commissioners would <br />prefer to allow one acre lots outside the critical area. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.