Agenda - 08-05-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

I in the Critical Area: I :, l0U /2P.0 - ale s`e`d_'Cl �ssYfi�ati :o�zt`Criteria I a Name Of Watershec: ker lake (Flack Creek) �. N *laic and cdc:css of Jens 'xuon- j ccun :y of Alamance fo;_:uture residential deveioprnent outside of 1 Gov j .24 Elm street 'a^ •c for fu:are non- residenza: developm - -n: Ln Ine I ve= v I:.=itee r ^Con'= pe`Son and phpne nu nber: + I R. =herd Honeycctt,' 919- 228 -1312 c. 1otai acreage of the wai=hed in your ju_'isdic:ion (ETJ 2415117 5. i otal acreage of the ware_ ghcd in the C :Natal Area that is r eside—mia!: I 746 � 16• Tc 21 acreae^ cf t..: water : ^,ed outside of tae C:;rcz; Area :hat is residenuai:� 7. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non- : :sidential: I 70 i I °. Total �crcage of the wateashed outside o,` the C':tit z1 Arta :ha: is non reside tins: :4C 9. Does yourjunsdic :ion curren:iy have Sto=water Con-ol Devices i.n use within I 1 1 resicerti�� wattrshec+ =as.: NO 0, Does your ;u: -isdiction ttrrently have Storrnwiter CO,1=01 Devices in use wit:' M on- residen i:t watershed areas? NO I 11. Existing residential den J:tv in the Critical Area: I :, l0U /2P.0 12. Local Bove- trnent inter►i for future residential development in the Critical Area: I iov /zxc 1:. xistmg residential den$ity outside o` the Critical Area: K env /zao 1A. J oczl government inters fo;_:uture residential deveioprnent outside of 1 Gov I tht C; mca: Amz: i 115. zeLl Gove:amcm site's for fu:are non- residenza: developm - -n: Ln Ine I ve= v I:.=itee Cra Gal Area: 1 �. i.o;.ai €Duel :lent intent for future non - residential develov:nen', outside 0, the (Limited it fir:.. t:i ' ' Area: • I 1 17 "ntal anreapt of `.a_-T:il lid within vour pomon of the watershed: lS.: e.;enrage of the toralni+atershed located within a start park o: national parklfores :: 1 p 15. in your opinion, what atetsncd ciassification would the watershed quaiify for under the adopted Rule? I ws 20. Wait classification w Id your -local government prefer for tae wateashed? Expiain. ws :761 I Based on the existing acreage per dwelling unit cf 26 acres per DU, the County would subri that 1 dwelling unit per acre should be adequate to orated this reser��'''ppp ir- For instance, 24,577 acres is 8.87% of the total county. A11oca:in8.87% of the projected County growth over the next twenty years, onlyi to housing units would be constructed in this area resulting in a den I ty of 14.7 acres per dwelling unit. i I I I I I ` i I I