Agenda - 08-05-1991 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

f Watershed Classification Criteria !. Name orWatcrshed: Lake natlnthosh (Bic A:amance) "?. Name and address of Junsdiction: l County of Alamance 124 W. Elm Street l S. Contact person and phone ntimocr: i Richard L. Honeycut. 919 - 226 -1312 I 14. Total acreage of the watershed in your iurisdiction (�7J inciuneo;: 3346 1 5. Total a�eage of the watershed in the Crincal Area that is residential: I 352 I 16. Totai acreage of the watershed outside of the CItical Area that is residential: I NA I 7. Total . acreage of the watershed in the C;:tic_l Area that is non- residen ;ial: I 40 j S. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the C:aicai Area ti 21 is non resident :a :: t.A 19. Does your ju isdiction cur entiy have Stormwater Control Devices in use .vithin I No I I - esidential watershed wreas? I —�� 0. Does your jurisdiction currentiy have Stormwater Co=ol Devices in use within No I 1 non - residential watershed areas? I� 11. Existing residential density in the Critical Area: I cicu /2hc 12. Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: I 1DU/ 13. Existing residential density outside of the Critical Are2: I N• 114. Local mover nmcnt intent for future residenual deveiopment outside of the Critical Area: .5. Local Govc,,nmcnt intent for future non - residential development in rile i Arr.2- - 16. Local goverriment intent for future non - residential development outside o: the I-/. Total acreage of farmland within your portion of the watershed: NA Very ILimsted I 1 1 NA 410 1$. Percentage o: the total watershed located within a state park or national parrJforest: 19. In vote opinior-, what watershed classification would the watershed qua4) for ws i.I I under tht adooted Rule? 20. What ciassifieation would your local government prefer for the watershed? =xpitin. tas Iwz Alamance County is already enforcing watershed protection regulations in this watershed which requires 2 acres per dwelling unit, and no new industry. Based on the discharges and proposed upstream development, we would submit that WSIII is an appropriate classi!icatior..