Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 <br />N /ratershed Classification Criteria <br />1. N of Watersnec: law River f5vnum Intake) <br />�. NAM, ne and ad:..css Of Jiums6 :c :1on: <br />County of Alamance <br />124 W. Elm Street <br />� <br />r„ ,c <br />13 Contact person and phone nurnoer: <br />Richard L. Honeycutt 0-19 -229 -1212 <br />G- Total acreage of the %vatcrshed to your juasdictton (�T; included): <br />336; <br />5. Total ac-:age of the watershed in the Critical Area that is residential: <br />6. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that iS r�Stdent al: R2�C/ I <br />144 <br />li 7. Total acreage of the watershed in :he C ^tical Arta that is non- residtn:ial: I <br />NA <br />S. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area t::a: is non- res16cr: :ia1' <br />5 <br />g Does your ju adiction cu ren :iy have 5tor r,%vater Con�oi Devices :n use %vi =n <br />I residential watershed areas? <br />I No <br />Does your jurisdiction cu: -ently have Sto -nwater Control Devices in use 'wit M,, <br />r <br />non- residential watershed areas? <br />No <br />existing residential density in the Critical Area: <br />I NA <br />12, Local government intent for future residential development in the C ideal Are_: <br />I <br />NA <br />1�. wxisti— residential density outside of the Critical Area: <br />IC10U /2AC <br />j 14. Local government intent for future residential d :veiopment outside of <br />I t -t Cnricai prtz: <br />1DU /AC <br />l5. Local Govem-ment tn---n: for future non - residential development in the <br />I Critical Area: <br />I NA <br />16. Local oovernmcnt intent for future non - residential development outside of the <br />I Critical Area: <br />!limited <br />i7. Total acreage of fa- -azland within your porion of the watershed: <br />I 1646 <br />j 1 S. Percentage of the total watershed located within a sate panic or national prJforest: <br />I o <br />19. in your opinion, what watershed classification would the watershed auaiify for <br />i under the adopted Ruie? <br />i ws av <br />20. What classification would your local government prefer for the watershed? Yxpiain. <br />ws zv <br />r <br />Based on the number of point source discharges on the Haw River, we <br />would <br />submit that restricting development beyond the WS Iv would not have <br />a <br />significant impact on water quality. <br />