Orange County NC Website
e~ <br />APPENDIX S <br />_Y <br />� /Vatershed Classification Criteria <br />1. Name o`WatersheC. Cane Creek (OWASA) <br />Z. Name and address of Junsdiction: <br />County of I,iamance <br />124 M. Elm street <br />p,r -,) CI <br />13. Contact person and phone number: <br />Ri.cnard L. Honevcust 919- 228 -1312 <br />I4. Total acreage of the watershed in your junsdicuon (ETJ included): g, ; <br />5. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is residential: I NA <br />6. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is residential: I 146 <br />7. Total acreage of the watershed in the Critical Area that is non - residential: Nn I <br />8. Total acreage of the watershed outside of the Critical Area that is non - residential: 3. <br />9. Does you: jurisdiction currentiv have Stormwater Conzrol Devices in use within <br />residentiJ watershed a eas? I NO <br />gy,l 1Q. Does your jurisdiction currently have Stornwater Control Devices in use within, <br />Ji1 Nn <br />non - residential watershed areas? <br />I�11. Existing residential density in the Critical Area: <br />y, <br />12. Local government intent for future residential development in the Critical Area: I NF, <br />13. Existing residential density outside of the Critical Area: <br />14. Local government intent for future residential development outside of <br />'. ,r. Local Government intent for future non - residential developmem. in the <br />16. Local government intent for future non - residential development outside of the <br />I]. Total acreage Of fa=iana wltnln your portion of the watershed: <br />ICl DU /2AC <br />I � <br />11ou /Ac <br />NA <br />imited <br />Ir <br />1004 <br />18. Percentage of the total watershed located within a state park or national pm- Mores :: I o <br />19. in your opinion., what watershed classification would the watt: shed ouaiify for <br />unde- the adODTMd Rule? WS == <br />20. What classification would your local government prefer for the watershed? _-xpiain. <br />WS 11: <br />Alamance County would' prefer to allow one acre lot development in this area <br />as is currently the practice. <br />