Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
U u 7 <br />I develgpment requests come in for that area. <br />2 <br />3 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br />4 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded y <br />5 <br />Insk <br />6 Commissioner b r r t t 1 r <br />returned to Board of Commissioners, no <br />7 recommendation to e <br />g sooner than August 5th. <br />9 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />10 Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />11 A motion was. made by Board and staff to consider <br />12 Commissioner Insko, to ask the Planning <br />13 designating an urban buffer that would connect the Eno State Park <br />14 with the Corridor Plan. <br />15 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />16 <br />17 3. ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENTS <br />1g A. Z -1 -91 James R. Sparrow <br />This item was presented by Emily Cameron. In summary, <br />19 <br />20 this item was presented to receive citizen c Tmme ub sect property <br />21 Zoning Atlas amendment in Bingham Township. th side of NC Highway 54 approximately 900 <br />22 is located on the nor <br />23 feet east of the Morrow Mill Road intersection. It is 2.94 acres <br />24 in size and known as lot 27A on tax map 26 of Bingham Township. <br />25 The current zoning is Neighborhood Commercial and Agricultural <br />26 Residential. The aPPoseaof an LCgle district dislgtoa allow limited <br />27 Commercial. The pu p <br />28 commercial uses designed to serve a population at the rural and <br />oads and personal services. <br />29 neighborhood level with convenience gb <br />30 The surrounding land on the north and west is zoned AR, ut <br />31 undeveloped; to the south and east are commercial uses. The area <br />32 is designated 1heComprehensive <br />Curre tlyPlthere is B therRLC�1 <br />33 Neighborhood Activity Node. <br />34 zoning within the activity node. <br />35 <br />36 COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND/OR <br />37 PLANNING BOARD <br />38 None. <br />39 <br />40 THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN COMMENT <br />41 <br />42 Mr. Greg Shepard, Shepard Design Associates, indicated that <br />Mr. Sparrow on this petition. He mentioned <br />43 he was representing <br />44 that in 1989 1.92 acres of this 2.92 acre tract was zoned NC -2. <br />45 At that point a total of`5 acres in this activity node were zoned <br />46 NC2. He stated that DOT has done a feasibility study for widening <br />47 54. Their feasibility study indicates that they would have to <br />buildable area on this tract. He stated that <br />4$ purchase all of the <br />49 they feel that they have met the four criteria in the zoning <br />50 ordinance which need to be satisfied in order to propose such a <br />51 rezoning. <br />52 <br />