Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-05-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 08-05-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:46:37 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 11:30:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
648
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sedgefield Community, bordering both sides of Whitfield Road is <br />being proposed for address changes stem approved will make for those the dentine <br />consistent with the numbering y <br />A roximately 240 residents along 23 subdivision roads <br />county. PP <br />d Rural <br />,Till be affected. These residents are the Cha el Hill postloffice. <br />Route 8 postal jurisdiction served by P <br />THERE WERE NO CON.MENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE BOARD OF COMN.ISSIONERS <br />AND /OR PLANNING BOARD <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT <br />Mr. W. Pierce, a Sedgefield resident, spoke in opposition to <br />the renumbering proposal. He indicated that Sedgefield already has <br />street names and house numbers • it wa ld scostr hi n in excess o0 <br />the Sedgefield residents license, <br />$1000.00 to make the necessary changes in letterhead, <br />checks, etc. <br />Mr. Donald Fox, a Sedgefield resident, spoke in opposition to <br />this proposal. <br />Mr. Rick Pratt, a Stoneridge resident, indicated that he also <br />opposed this plan to renumber. He indicated o n e it pion, not <br />coordinator at the RTP, and in his exp <br />in order to protect the integrity <br />necessary to make these changes <br />of the system. <br />sident of Stoneridge, spoke in <br />Ms. Maryann Bassett, a re <br />opposition to this proposal. <br />f Stoneridge, spoke in opposition <br />Mr. Tam Hurtgen, a resident o <br />to this renumbering proposal. <br />Commissioner Carey indicated al ontseveral occasions.o�Eachotime <br />has reconsidered this prop <br />the Board has decided to proceed with this project., <br />frm Collins <br />In response to question question have srural. route <br />of the homes n <br />indicated that none osed house numbers can <br />be <br />numbers. He also indicated that the prop <br />no larger than 4 digits. He nmbe t ionedr jest the County is trying <br />to be consistent in this renu 9 p <br />A motion was made by <br />Commissioner Insko, seconded by <br />Commissioner Willhoit, to approve the r <br />poposed house and building <br />numbers for Rural Route 2, Timberlake Subdivision, (allowed by <br />notification to the Timberlake postmaste , and he N. C. Department <br />of Transportation, as require d by <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by <br />A motion was <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.