Orange County NC Website
I <br />�I SUPERINTENDENT'S BUDGET MESSAGE <br />1991 -92 <br />It is well established that these are bleak economic times. The news media are replete with <br />reports about the financial crisis. It is undeniable that education at all levels- federal, state, and <br />local- wi'.': be adversely affected by this economic crisis. Already we are being advised to expect <br />substantial cuts in the state budget. In addition, the local tax base has not kept pace with the cost <br />of living, let alone the growth in the student population. It is against this backdrop that the 1991 -92 <br />budget proposal was developed. <br />Ironically, school districts are faced with cutting education budgets at the same time that <br />more is being expected of educators in terms of student performance. These expectations are at <br />crass purposes. School improvement cannot be achieved without adequate resources. The citizens <br />of this community have consistently placed a high value on quality education and have indicated <br />their strong support for more funds for better schools even if it means paying higher taxes. In our <br />district, a survey by an independent organization showed that 80 percent of the general public and <br />86 percent of parents have stated that they would support higher taxes for schools. Furthermore, a <br />similar survey last spring showed that 78 percent of our Black parents, who are among the most <br />economically disadvantaged residents, would also be willing to support higher taxes for schools. <br />More than ever, this support is needed now. <br />Improved student learning continues to be a goal for the Chapel Hill - Carrboro School <br />District. The existing student performance indicators tell us that students are doing well. Scores <br />on the CAT continue to be well above state and national norms, as indicated by the state's first <br />report card. In addition, our SAT scores are the highest they have been in 20 years with a <br />combined average score of 1043 and even above school systems with similar socio- economic <br />characteristics. Our dropout rate is at 2.68 percent, one of the lowest in the state. After years of <br />intervention, our efforts with at -risk students appear to be resulting in substantial gains. Our <br />eighth grade scores for Black students now have reached the national average. <br />We continue, though, to strive for even better student performance. Goals for the next <br />several years include mastery of basic skills of reading and math for all students, all students <br />demonstrating the ability to solve problems and to think critically, high school graduation or an <br />equivalency degree expected of all students, community service required of middle and high school <br />students and all students exiting high school prepared for post - secondary school or a job that leads <br />to a career. Achieving these goals will require restructuring of the curriculum and instructional <br />program, more flexibility and autonomy for staff and parents at the school site, and a greater <br />emphasis on technology. <br />Educational excellence requires adequate funding. In addition to funds to support a <br />growing student population and to maintain existing successful programs, increased funding is <br />needed to meet the Board's goals. <br />Several assumptions have been made in preparing the revenue portion of the budget. The <br />first is that the tax base will grow by only a modest three percent. Secondly, the appropriated fund <br />balance will decline from $750,000 to $400,000 now that the unencumbered reserve has been <br />decreased to 5.5 percent as directed by the County Commissioners. Thirdly, since 1986 when the <br />Basic Education Plan (BEP) was passed, local school districts could rely on the BEP to provide <br />additional positions. This is no longer possible and local districts are even facing the possibility of <br />losing state positions. Finally, because of our critical needs and a bleak budget picture, the Board <br />requested at its planning conference in February that the district tax rate be increased to support the <br />