Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-25-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 06-25-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:04:11 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:47:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
806
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />AGENDA ITEM #9: <br />AGENDA ITEM #10: <br />MOTION: <br />VOTE: <br />I <br />SUBDIVISION APPLICATIONS <br />a. Preliminary Plats <br />(1) Cornwallis Hills - Time Extension <br />Mary Scearbo asked that this item be deleted from <br />the agenda. Discussions with the County Attorney <br />indicated that the new procedures under which a <br />project may be granted a time extension must be <br />addressed. Since the subdivision was approved <br />before the new procedures were enacted, there was <br />a question of their applicability to this <br />project. <br />The applicant's engineer has been made aware of <br />the situation and will provide additional <br />information at a later date. <br />MATTERS HEARD AT PUBLIC HEARING (5/29/90) <br />a. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br />(1) University Lake Watershed Protection. <br />(a) Article 6.15.2 Interim Development <br />Standards Approved <br />(b) Article 6.25.7 Water Supply /Sewage <br />Disposal Facilities Required <br />Burklin moved approval of the proposed <br />amendments. Seconded by Eddleman. <br />Unanimous. <br />(2 ) Definitions <br />(a) Article 22 Efficiency Apartment <br />Mary Scearbo noted that there were no <br />comments on this proposed amendment <br />at the public hearing. One letter was <br />received by the Planning Department and <br />entered into the public record. The letter <br />expressed overall support of the amendment <br />but suggested that a maximum of 800 square <br />feet be allowed for all efficiency apartments <br />to accommodate the handicapped. <br />Contacts with the Department of insurance <br />have indicated that an area of 750 to 800 <br />square feet is necessary for a handicapped <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.