Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-25-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 06-25-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 11:04:11 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:47:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/25/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
806
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c <br />1.0 <br />I <br />system," and "community alternative system." The latter definition was inadvertently <br />omitted when revisions to the interim development standards for University Lake <br />watershed were adopted. <br />QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND PLANNING BOARD <br />Commissioner Hartwell indicated that he believes this was meant to address the <br />repair of existing systems. However, it is not stated that way in 6.25.7. In <br />response to this comment, Collins stated that a new system will eventually be <br />considered an existing system. That system could then end up with a failing septic <br />system and would need the latitude provided by this amendment. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to <br />refer the proposed amendments to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be <br />returned to the Board of Commissioners no sooner than August 6, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />G.ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />2. DEFINITIONS <br />a. Article 22 Efficiency Apartment <br />This presentation was made by Mary Scearbo. In summary this item was <br />presented to receive public comment on a proposed amendment to the definition of <br />"efficiency apartment" to allow flexibility as to the location of such units. <br />NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, PLANNING .BOARD OR CITIZENS <br />A motion was made Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner Marshall, to refer <br />the proposed amendment to the Planning Board for a recommendation to be returned to <br />the Board-of Commissioners no sooner than August 6, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />H.SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS TEXT AMENDMENTS <br />1. Definitions <br />a. Section II Subdivision <br />b. .Section II Minor Subdivision <br />These presentations were made by Mary Scearbo. In summary these items were <br />presented to receive public comment on a proposed amendment to the Subdivision <br />Regulations to allow the combination or recombination of non - conforming lots. Item H- <br />1-b proposes an amendment to the definition of minor subdivision in Section II of the <br />Subdivision Regulations. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Willhoit, seconded by Commission Carey, to refer <br />these amendments to the Planning Board to be returned to the Board of Commissioners no <br />sooner than August 6, 1990. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />2. Anneal Procedure <br />.a. Section III -C -5 Minor Subdivision <br />b. Section III -D -1 Concept Plan /Major Subdivision <br />C. Section III -D -4 Final Plan /Major Subdivision <br />These presentations were made by Emily Crudup. In summary these items <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.