Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 06-03-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:52:34 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:43:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
W <br />Location in Protected Watershed <br />One impetus for developing a purchase of development rights <br />proposal was the desire to address the concerns of landowners in <br />watershed areas. In April, 1990, permitted residential densities in <br />the University Lake watershed were lowered to one dwelling unit per <br />five acres. Prior to that time, land in a designated critical area <br />could be developed at a density of one unit per two acres. Outside <br />of a critical area, densities of one unit per acre were permitted.. <br />By July 1, 1992, Orange County as well as other local <br />governments across North Carolina must submit watershed protection <br />ordinances to the N.C. Environmental Management Commission for <br />approval. The State - mandated watershed protection programs will <br />have a significant impact on Orange County, since nearly 60 percent <br />of the county's land area is in one watershed or another. <br />From the standpoint of watershed protection, retaining land in <br />agriculture and forest use can be beneficial. Where development is <br />limited, stormwater discharges and pollutants carried by the runoff <br />are reduced. The basis for assigning points for this factor is thus <br />to award higher scores in areas where watershed protection <br />standards are more stringent, and few or none where such standards <br />are limited or do not exist. <br />Location in Protected Watershed Points <br />Inside WS -II watershed 10.0 <br />Inside critical area of WS -III watershed 7.5 <br />Outside critical area of WS -III watershed 5.0 <br />Inside WS -IV watershed 2.5 <br />Outside protected watershed 0.0 <br />The watershed classifications referenced above are those <br />proposed by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission. <br />Associated with each classification is a set of minimum watershed <br />protection standards, summarized in graphic form on the following <br />pages. <br />Presence of Natural Areas <br />Another.:_4—,4 for the preparation of this proposal was the <br />desire to.pp6tect significant natural areas and wildlife habitats. <br />In 1987 and 1988, the Triangle Land Conservancy conducted an <br />inventory and identified 64 such sites in Orange County. These <br />sites are potentially. threatened by agricultural as well as urban <br />expansion. The assignment of points based on the significance of <br />the site recognizes their importance. The acquisition of <br />development rights will protect such sites from urban expansion, <br />but it does not address cropland expansion and deforestation. These <br />concerns may be addressed through the use of conservation easements <br />which limit the disturbance and /or destruction of natural, areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.