Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 06-03-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:52:34 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:43:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21, <br />It is the group relative values that are used to calculate the <br />value of one site relative to another for forest land use. The <br />assignment of relative value ranges and the calculation of group <br />relative values is shown in detail on Table 10. <br />APPLICATION <br />As was the case with cropland, the average relative value of a <br />forest site must be calculated before a decision is made about <br />whether or not to acquire the development rights. To determine the <br />average relative value, the following procedure is used: <br />1. Locate the site on a soil survey map and determine the <br />kind of soils on the site. <br />2. Determine the acreage of each soil and the appropriate <br />forest land group for each soil. <br />3. Multiply the number of acres of soils in each <br />forest land group times the group relative value on <br />Table 10. <br />4. Add the products of the multiplication performed in step <br />3. <br />5. Divide the total value obtained in step 4 by the total <br />acreage on the site. The quotient will represent the <br />average relative value of the site. <br />To illustrate the application of this procedure, the relative <br />values of the farms of each member of the Agricultural Districts <br />Advisory Board were calculated. Only forest land and only that <br />portion of a farm contiguous to the homestead were considered in <br />the calculations. Based on the calculations shown on Table 11, the <br />Walters (94) farm ranked the highest for acquisition of development <br />rights, followed by the Hogan (91), Strayhorn (90), Nutter (89), <br />and Rogers (76) farms. <br />In the next section, a technique for assessing the economic <br />viability of a site for agricultural use is presented. In <br />combination. -Vith the techniques for evaluating cropland and forest <br />land qualt;:.it will determine where a site falls on the overall <br />rating scale -f-or development rights acquisition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.