Orange County NC Website
important farmland available. In fact, the first few agricultural <br />groups may consist of prime farmlands. Different classes of <br />important farmland should not be combined in any one group. For <br />example, prime farmland soils should be in a group or groups by <br />themselves, state /locally important farmlands should be in a group <br />or groups by themselves, etc. <br />The important farmland classes for Orange County soils are <br />shown in Appendix C. In Column 5 of.Table 2, soils have been placed <br />in agricultural groups according to important farmland class. <br />Orange County Agricultural Groups <br />Based on the above land evaluation methods, Orange County <br />soils have been placed in agricultural groups. The groups are <br />summarized below in Table 1 and are presented, by soil type, in <br />Column 9 of Table 2. <br />Table 1 <br />Orange County Agricultural Groups <br />As indicated above, soils are rated and placed into <br />agricultural groups ranging from the best to the worst suited for <br />cropland use.., Agricultural group 1 should contain the best soils <br />available_- &:g., those with the highest relative value for cropland <br />in terms bf-7 .productivity index and the least limitations to such <br />use. The aoils-in agricultural groups 2 -1.0 should have successively <br />lower relative values in terms of overall productivity index, <br />higher costs to correct and maintain soil limitations, or both. <br />To determine the relative values for each agricultural group, <br />the following procedure is used: <br />1. List each soil type in the agricultural groups. <br />2. Obtain the acreage and adjusted yield for each soil type <br />in the agricultural groups. <br />Important <br />Percent <br />Agricultural <br />Land <br />Farmland <br />Productivity <br />of <br />Group <br />Capability <br />Class <br />Index <br />Land Area <br />1 -T <br />---- - -- <br />2E -2W <br />Prime <br />85 -100 <br />38.5% <br />2 <br />2E -3E <br />Prime <br />66 -81 <br />17.5% <br />3 <br />2E -3E <br />State /Local <br />71 -76 <br />16.5% <br />4 <br />2E -4W <br />State /Local <br />61 -66 <br />5.7% <br />5 <br />3E -4E <br />Other <br />42 -71 <br />12.7% <br />6 <br />6S -7S <br />Other <br />51 -56 <br />1.8% <br />7 <br />4E -7S <br />Other <br />NA <br />4.7% <br />8 <br />Urban <br />Other <br />NA <br />2.6% <br />As indicated above, soils are rated and placed into <br />agricultural groups ranging from the best to the worst suited for <br />cropland use.., Agricultural group 1 should contain the best soils <br />available_- &:g., those with the highest relative value for cropland <br />in terms bf-7 .productivity index and the least limitations to such <br />use. The aoils-in agricultural groups 2 -1.0 should have successively <br />lower relative values in terms of overall productivity index, <br />higher costs to correct and maintain soil limitations, or both. <br />To determine the relative values for each agricultural group, <br />the following procedure is used: <br />1. List each soil type in the agricultural groups. <br />2. Obtain the acreage and adjusted yield for each soil type <br />in the agricultural groups. <br />