Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 06-03-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:52:34 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:43:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/1991
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
converted to 100, and all other yields are converted to an index <br />relative to 100. For example, the estimated yield for a corn crop <br />on Altavista soil is 103 bushels /acre. Thus, the productivity index <br />would be 100 (103/103 = 1 x 100). For Congaree soil, the estimated <br />yield is 98 bushels /acre, and the productivity index would be 95 <br />(98/103 = .95 x 100). <br />Soils are placed in agricultural groups according to their <br />productivity index. Each group should have fairly narrow limits; <br />e.g., 90 -100, 80 -90, etc. Where groups have a range wider than 15 <br />or 20, they should be regrouped to achieve a narrower range. In <br />some of the lower groups, where soil productivity varies <br />considerably, a wider range may be necessary. <br />For each agricultural group, the limits in productivity index <br />will decrease from the highest, shown in agricultural group 1, to a <br />lower value or zero, in lower groups. Soils in some lower groups <br />may have a relatively high productivity index, because of the high <br />costs of overcoming soil limitations resulting from a class III, <br />IV, or higher classification. <br />The estimated yields and productivity index for Orange County <br />soils are shown in Appendix B. In Column 6 of Table 2, soils have <br />been placed in agricultural groups according to productivity index. <br />Important Farmlands <br />In 1.982, the USDA developed definitions of and criteria for <br />classifying important farmlands as part of the Farmland Protection <br />Policy Act. The most commonly used definitions for farmland <br />preservation purposes are prime farmlands, state /locally important <br />farmlands, and other farmlands. <br />Prime farmland is land that has the best combination of <br />physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, <br />fiber, forage, oilseed, and other agricultural crops with minimum <br />inputs of fuel, fertilizer, pesticides, and labor. It may be <br />cropland, pastureland, or forest land but not urban built -up land <br />or water. <br />State and locally important farmland is land, in addition to <br />prime farml:a-Ad, that is of statewide and local importance for the <br />production- 'b�f food,- feed, fiber,. forage, and oilseed crops. <br />Criteria 6r`'-_defining and delineating such land are determined by <br />the appropriate state and local agency or agencies. State and <br />locally important farmlands include those that are nearly prime <br />farmland and that economically produce high yields of crops when <br />treated and managed according to acceptable farming methods. <br />Other farmlands include those that are not classified as prime <br />farmland or state and locally important farmland. <br />Soils are placed in agricultural groups according to the <br />assigned important farmland class; e.g., prime, state /local, or <br />other. Agricultural group 1 should include the highest class of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.