Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-28-1991
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1991
>
Agenda - 05-28-1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2017 10:47:23 AM
Creation date
11/8/2017 10:41:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/1991
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
230
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
New Hope Coridor Open Space Mawr Plan <br />These areas would provide locations for such features as wildlife habitats, trails, and access <br />areas. <br />The Advisory Committee recommends that the participating governing boards move to protect <br />the following areas: <br />• New Hope Creek from NC 54 north and west to Erwin Road in Orange County; <br />• Dry Creek from New Hope Creek on the north side of the Chapel Hill- Durham <br />Boulevard west to Erwin Road and the future Chapel Hill greenway; <br />• Mud Creek from New Hope Creek north to NC 751; <br />• Connections between Mud Creek-NC 751 and the Eno River State Park along NC 751 <br />and Orange County roads (to the west); and <br />• Sandy Creek from New Hope Creek on the south side of Chapel Hill- Durham <br />Boulevard northeast across the Boulevard to NC 751. <br />After adoption of the Master Plan by the four jurisdictions, a permanent Advisory Committee <br />should be established to monitor and advise in carrying out the recommendations of the plan and <br />to nurture and foster citizens' involvement in preservation and acquisition. The membership of <br />the Committee would be drawn from the planning and open space agencies of the four <br />jurisdictions with additional representation of interested citizens and property owners. <br />The Committee should be official and permanent and should be charged with the responsibility <br />of overseeing the corridor's future, including reviewing and making recommendations <br />concerning development proposals, annual budgets, etc., that affect the corridor. The <br />Committee should not be responsible for operations related to the corridor. The Committee <br />should require only minimal staff support in carrying out its duties. <br />The Implementation Recommendations (Section III.) consist of three phases, which would take <br />place over a maximum of 20 years: <br />Phase 1. Priority Corridor Acquisition (Years 1 -5) <br />Objective: Through acquisition, to utilize land presently under control of the City of <br />Durham, Duke University, and the Corps of Engineers, as well as that <br />acquired through purchase of opportunity in the Wildlife Protection Area <br />and other acquisition opportunities that are presented through rezoning, <br />negotiation, or donation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.